Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or send some microbes which convert it into oxygen. You are right Mars doesn't have enough resources to support anything.
that's an interesting proposition. If terraforming is really about engineering the right microbes to slowly (over several millenia even?) the atmosphere to habitable for humans, do we currently have the technology to actually accomplish it? Or is it still too advanced form of engineering?
Venus could have been habitable for billions of years (2019)
71–80 of 236 posts
Re: Venus could have been habitable for billions of years (2019)
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
The "clockwork" view is objectively incorrect due to being the wrong scale. (Some) Accurate scale models of the solar system get played out across city blocks. If it's a tinkertoy style model or a drawing within a book, it's made up BS. There are no books large enough to actually show it to scale. Edit: For the pedants of the world, I have added "(Some)" to my sentence. "Not all accurate scale models" of course. Some…
City blocks? Sweden has a scale model of the solar system that stretches across the entire country - north to south. And even then it isn’t actually big/long enough for the entire solar system.
Re: Venus could have been habitable for billions of years (2019)
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
Humans had civilization before we knew how to use fossil fuels, we just didn't have industrial civilization. AIUI civilization mostly consists of agreeing to live and work together in groups bigger than Dunbar's number.
Yeah of course would you'd need to redefine civilization as "inudstrial" civilization for my argumentn to make sense. Still, check out parent post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26563017 tl;dr: we've kickstarted civilization due to our harnessing of energy. If the venusians didn't have that option they would've probably lived as cavemen and couldn't have prevented or foreseen the disaster.
This is one of the reasons this story sticks in my mind.
Re: Venus could have been habitable for billions of years (2019)
#74It's interesting that multi-cellular life developed on Earth around the same time these scientists hypothesize Venus would have become uninhabitable. Unrelated... still, fun to think about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_evolutionary_h...
We need to start developing meaningful working hypotheses and make judgement calls instead of waiting till we have definitive proof. This was similar to how basically no one was surprised that every star out there has planets around it yet we were writing sci-fi under that assumptions for basically a century before definitive proof.
Re: Venus could have been habitable for billions of years (2019)
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
The "clockwork" view is objectively incorrect due to being the wrong scale. (Some) Accurate scale models of the solar system get played out across city blocks. If it's a tinkertoy style model or a drawing within a book, it's made up BS. There are no books large enough to actually show it to scale. Edit: For the pedants of the world, I have added "(Some)" to my sentence. "Not all accurate scale models" of course. Some…
City blocks? Sweden has a scale model of the solar system that stretches across the entire country - north to south. And even then it isn’t actually big/long enough for the entire solar system.
Sweden was, last I checked, larger than a city block.
Re: Venus could have been habitable for billions of years (2019)
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's practically guaranteed. Eventually, the Sun will expand so much that Earth's atmosphere will boil clean off. A mega-civilization with enormous power could move Earth, buy some time, but nothing lasts forever.
Why move earth when you could just throw up some shade? By then things would be so different it's impossible to imagine what humans might do or be capable of our interested in - if we're still around.
Re: Venus could have been habitable for billions of years (2019)
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's mindblowing is the search for planet 9...once you start to realize that we are surrounded by thousands of dead solar systems (brown dwarfs that very likely were red dwarfs before) in our immediate neighborhood. Imagine what we could accomplish by mining their resources!
What does this mean? Surrounded by thousands of dead solar systems? Like nearby (dark) stars?
https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/marckuchner/backyard-wor...
Re: Venus could have been habitable for billions of years (2019)
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's mindblowing is the search for planet 9...once you start to realize that we are surrounded by thousands of dead solar systems (brown dwarfs that very likely were red dwarfs before) in our immediate neighborhood. Imagine what we could accomplish by mining their resources!
What does this mean? Surrounded by thousands of dead solar systems? Like nearby (dark) stars?
Re: Venus could have been habitable for billions of years (2019)
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
What does this mean? Surrounded by thousands of dead solar systems? Like nearby (dark) stars?
They are called brown dwarfs... but it's better to link the NASA backyard worlds project directly for the curious: https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/marckuchner/backyard-wor...
Re: Venus could have been habitable for billions of years (2019)
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it's the way it's presented. We still have a sort of Newtonian "clockwork" view in primary education of astronomy.
The "clockwork" view is objectively incorrect due to being the wrong scale. (Some) Accurate scale models of the solar system get played out across city blocks. If it's a tinkertoy style model or a drawing within a book, it's made up BS. There are no books large enough to actually show it to scale. Edit: For the pedants of the world, I have added "(Some)" to my sentence. "Not all accurate scale models" of course. Some…