Live data from Hacker News

What is consciousness? Some new perspectives from our physics project

writings.stephenwolfram.com

21–30 of 103 posts

Re: What is consciousness? Some new perspectives from our physics project

#21

Careful. "Consciousness" may just be a language issue. It seems like a profound concept but it's really just a word with a very vague and complex definition. If someone tried to formalize "consciousness" it would be a technical book about 1000 pages long or something and all we're doing is debating about what goes in the book. It's very similar to the question what is "life?" I mean we understand that biology is just…

Every single living person has a priori knowledge that it's not just a language issue.

Re: What is consciousness? Some new perspectives from our physics project

#23

I think of consciousness as a feeling and nothing more. Similar to the feeling of free will, both are an "illusion" and we're not actually aware or free. The universe is made of instructions that everything follows and including us. We believing in awareness is just instructions for how we operate as subsystems of the Universe and like or unlike other subsystems of the universe. I find the idea simpler to grasp if yo…

So, what would you say a "feeling" is, exactly?

It's just a type of sensation!

Re: What is consciousness? Some new perspectives from our physics project

#25

I think of consciousness as a feeling and nothing more. Similar to the feeling of free will, both are an "illusion" and we're not actually aware or free. The universe is made of instructions that everything follows and including us. We believing in awareness is just instructions for how we operate as subsystems of the Universe and like or unlike other subsystems of the universe. I find the idea simpler to grasp if yo…

But to feel is the core of consciousness/qualia. You can postulate free will as an illusion, but is harder with consciousness.

Re: What is consciousness? Some new perspectives from our physics project

#26
I don't know if something of this is real, falsifiable, or how much of it is original work (and surely you need to peel off the Wolfram classic ego driven sentences) but I think I'm not the only one finding this project thought provoking and beautiful, at least in a poetic sense.

Re: What is consciousness? Some new perspectives from our physics project

#27

I don't know if something of this is real, falsifiable, or how much of it is original work (and surely you need to peel off the Wolfram classic ego driven sentences) but I think I'm not the only one finding this project thought provoking and beautiful, at least in a poetic sense.

Borderline quack in my opinion

Re: What is consciousness? Some new perspectives from our physics project

#28

I like panpsychism: everything in the universe exhibits varying degrees of "consciousness."

This is probably true. There are things definitely less conscious than us. It'll be interesting if it is possible for us to comprehend higher consciousness or if its like a never ending race to the top. Creatures so intelligent they are just beyond our comprehension.

Re: What is consciousness? Some new perspectives from our physics project

#29

No explanation of consciousness cuts it if it does not address how first person perspective comes about. No computation results in first person perspective.

How much are you willing to bet that consciousness is not a computation? What else could it be? If we don't live in a world organized by physics and causality, then it would extremely unlikely life could even emerge altogether. The fact that the world is ultimately predictable makes it more likely we emerge, not less.

Re: What is consciousness? Some new perspectives from our physics project

#30

Careful. "Consciousness" may just be a language issue. It seems like a profound concept but it's really just a word with a very vague and complex definition. If someone tried to formalize "consciousness" it would be a technical book about 1000 pages long or something and all we're doing is debating about what goes in the book. It's very similar to the question what is "life?" I mean we understand that biology is just…

I agree with the language part you said. I find worrying that Wolfram is not talking enough about it.

It’s because it’s probably not possible to define within the standard “toolset”. Look at for example the thoughts of the definition of energy by R. Feynman. You might think us physicists for sure can define energy. After all it’s one of the basis of physics. But it turns out it’s not possible without circular arguments
Post reply on HN