Live data from Hacker News

YouTube and Patreon Still Aren’t Paying the Rent for Most Creatives

marker.medium.com

171–180 of 249 posts

Re: YouTube and Patreon Still Aren’t Paying the Rent for Most Creatives

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree, people should think about it as a lottery ticket. How many people spend $10Ks over the years trying to become good at soccer/basketball/baseball/golf/etc. so they can go pro? We know that it is a 1 in a million shot but results in a multi-billion dollar industry. Creators have to decide on their goals. I design board games on the side. I don't expect it to ever break even, let alone replace my salary but I d…

I would say I'm an alright tennis player, have been playing since I was younger, lessons, coaches, the whole thing. Never even got close to playing at a D1 school though. Mostly out of curiosity, I looked into what it looks like to go pro now. Basically you go into a machine as a young kid, and if you show promise, you get focus from the coaching staff at the academies. Everyone else is basically just a warm body who…

Meritocracies always produce the biggest difference in outcomes of results.

Re: YouTube and Patreon Still Aren’t Paying the Rent for Most Creatives

#172
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The BBC is widely and justly praised! So long as you like its choices, everything is great. Central coordinators can, as you say, earn widespread praise and acclaim. What happens if you're an artist that the BBC isn't interested in supporting? What happens when the BBC runs out of budget for the year?

You can't make it because you don't have the budget. Then you start a YouTube channel appealing to the lowest common denominator and die a little more inside each day as you yell "ring that bell" umpteen times whilst pumping out content to avoid losing the favor of the algorithm. But you find success so keep doing it whilst hoping you remain popular and don't get demonetized. You still don't get to make the thing you…

Really, what I'm looking for is if you've thought about the failure modes of centralized management of resources and tastemaking. It seems you believe there are no different ones. Is that accurate?

Re: YouTube and Patreon Still Aren’t Paying the Rent for Most Creatives

#173
post #148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In general I agree with your statement. But the grim reality is that good jobs are hard to get. It’s not always possible to find better opportunity. And you may not have the resources necessary to find something better (e.g. I can’t afford to go in a better job opportunity‘a interview, because I can’t get time off my current job, and I need this job to survive. About 10 years ago I was living in San Francisco on less…

This is such a bizarre take. You're living in San Francisco, one of the most prestigious cities in the world, and yet you're describing your situation as if you're living in Sangvor, Tajikistan. No one in San Francisco is stuck. [1] By skipping a few of those movie tickets and buying months in advance you could get a plane ticket out of there. In plenty of places in the US there isn't even an airport, not to mention…

And do where? The money I knew how to earn was in San Francisco. I didn't know how to earn a living in a much cheaper spot. Everything I knew was there. If I scraped together enough money for a plane ticket, what would I do when I got there?

Re: YouTube and Patreon Still Aren’t Paying the Rent for Most Creatives

#174

Why should these creators deserve to be paid more? Making money on YouTube and Patreon is a privilege not a right. Yes the big creators make a lot of money, but that's because a lot of users are watching them. If someone is trying to make a career out of YouTube while only making $10,000 a year then the only problem is the person trying to make a career out of that. Making $10,000 on YouTube at all puts you well far…

> Yes the big creators make a lot of money, but that's because a lot of users are watching them

That's true for anything, even for non-creative work. If you create an app, and nobody buys it (or uses it with ads), you also don't get money.

Re: YouTube and Patreon Still Aren’t Paying the Rent for Most Creatives

#175
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're right of course, most can leave. But in leaving you are leaving perhaps your best market (depends on what you do, but as an example, let's say you DJ). And also, by extension, you're sort of suggesting everyone making less than 6 figures leave. I'm putting words in your mouth, I know, and I apologize. But it's the gentrification I am bringing up. So many construction workers that repair roofs, install drywall,…

The housing policy of San Francisco definitely makes lives more difficult than it has to be. My point is more so around realizing the wealth of opportunity. Yes not every DJ will make it in San Francisco, but as you allude to, in most places in the world zero DJs will make it. I don't claim that life can't be challenging in/around San Francisco. I'm claiming that it's less challenging than in almost anywhere else in…

Agree.

Re: YouTube and Patreon Still Aren’t Paying the Rent for Most Creatives

#176

While I wish my own Patreon were better funded and the issues in this space are real, this isn't going to be entirely solved by working only on the income end of things. The US needs to reform its housing policies and find a better solution for providing healthcare for all citizens. If it were easier to find a small place to rent for less than $500 per month in the US, if it were easier to live without a car and if t…

An example of this is the movie "Pursuit of Happiness". Having family/friends to lean on can help in many cases. However, many people are simply too overwhelmed by life to work on improving their situation or even trying something like...

https://www.mrmoneymustache.com/

Re: YouTube and Patreon Still Aren’t Paying the Rent for Most Creatives

#178

Why should these creators deserve to be paid more? Making money on YouTube and Patreon is a privilege not a right. Yes the big creators make a lot of money, but that's because a lot of users are watching them. If someone is trying to make a career out of YouTube while only making $10,000 a year then the only problem is the person trying to make a career out of that. Making $10,000 on YouTube at all puts you well far…

Yeah. Most indie game devs don't make enough from it to pay rent. Most authors don't make enough to pay rent from writing.

When we talk about copyrights, there's always an argument made in their favour which is basically 'we have to engineer incentives in order to get people to make good new stuff'. Why does that apply to copyright law but not to regulating tech monopolies like Youtube?

Re: YouTube and Patreon Still Aren’t Paying the Rent for Most Creatives

#179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree, people should think about it as a lottery ticket. How many people spend $10Ks over the years trying to become good at soccer/basketball/baseball/golf/etc. so they can go pro? We know that it is a 1 in a million shot but results in a multi-billion dollar industry. Creators have to decide on their goals. I design board games on the side. I don't expect it to ever break even, let alone replace my salary but I d…

I would say I'm an alright tennis player, have been playing since I was younger, lessons, coaches, the whole thing. Never even got close to playing at a D1 school though. Mostly out of curiosity, I looked into what it looks like to go pro now. Basically you go into a machine as a young kid, and if you show promise, you get focus from the coaching staff at the academies. Everyone else is basically just a warm body who…

that's one of the failings of the youtube system it relies on the creators to self evaluate their success whereas in sports its pretty obvious when you hit the wall. a few will push through by paying lots of money for private coaching but most are naturally weeded out. content creators though have that constant carrot of if they try a bit harder or make more varied videos the algorithm may bless them with millions of viewers.

Re: YouTube and Patreon Still Aren’t Paying the Rent for Most Creatives

#180
post #37

Why should these creators deserve to be paid more? Making money on YouTube and Patreon is a privilege not a right. Yes the big creators make a lot of money, but that's because a lot of users are watching them. If someone is trying to make a career out of YouTube while only making $10,000 a year then the only problem is the person trying to make a career out of that. Making $10,000 on YouTube at all puts you well far…

I can see your argument. On the other hand, the article mentions people who work for companies like Buzzfeed and other agencies, creating extremely successful web content for them, having to work shifts at night on top of their media jobs. That sounds unacceptable to me: I am pretty sure the company employing them can afford them a living wage, and it looks a lot like exploitation.

On the other hand, people who work entry-level jobs also work multiple job sometimes
Post reply on HN