Live data from Hacker News

Visa Plans to Enable Bitcoin Payments at 70M Merchants

btctimes.com

521–530 of 530 posts

Re: Visa Plans to Enable Bitcoin Payments at 70M Merchants

#521

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All else being equal, given that you turned $100 into $100K, you're much more likely to have $100K that you can afford to lose. Saying that the history of your investing shouldn't impact your choices is saying that your total wealth shouldn't affect your choices. But if I borrowed $100K against my home and it gets foreclosed and I'm homeless, that's very different from if I gambled $100 and got $100K whose loss will…

That's exactly the fallacy I was describing. Whether or not you can afford to lose money is completely independent of how much your initial investments cost. You will tend to make more money, provided you have some ability to predict, if you do what you predict is best based on the present and the future, compared to changing your decisions based on the origins of your money.

  A = Bob has $1M in bitcoin.
  B = Bob can afford to lose $1M.
It appears to me you think P(B) = P(B|A). I think obviously P(B) How about:

  A = Bob has $1M in bitcoin which he paid $100 for.
  B = Bob has $1M in bitcoin which he paid $1M for.
  C = Bob can afford to lose $1M.
It appears to me you believe P(C|A) = P(C|B) = P(C). I'd expect P(C|A) > P(C|B).

Re: Visa Plans to Enable Bitcoin Payments at 70M Merchants

#522
post #519

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess you’ve never heard about stablecoins?

Tether and Tether copycats command the lion’s share of stablecoin usage. While it’s true Tether isn’t a speculative store of value — custodial risk of Tether notwithstanding — it’s also an IOU, not a cryptocurrency. Contrary to popular belief, alternative free-floating “stablecoins” aren’t actually stable: every major example of one has imploded at least once in times of high market volatility. This makes them specul…

Well I guess be ready to be proven wrong.

Re: Visa Plans to Enable Bitcoin Payments at 70M Merchants

#523

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is an amazingly cynical take. I mean, I wish you all the luck in the world in your attempt to get rich, but you're making a bet that the global economy is going to collapse, in part aided by a pandemic, and rather than doing anything to help, the world's wealthy are going to opt out of using their wealth to help anyone in favor of hoarding bit patterns on hard drives in their dragon caves. I don't think I want t…

I don't like where the world is heading either, but let's get real: JP Morgan is on board, now advising their investors to join in (and the bank behind Coinbase) Fidelity is on board Morgan Stanley is on board Visa, MasterCard AMEX has been using crypto to get best possible currency exchange rates for a couple years Coinbase has a healthy relationship with the SEC and is about to get their banking charter approved fo…

JP Morgan: has released a laughable whitepaper, and purchased zero bitcoin

Fidelity: Provides custody services for a fee, hasnt directly invested

Morgan Stanley: Provides custody services for a fee, hasnt directly invested

Visa, MasterCard: have made some press releases, but dont appear to actually do anything yet

AMEX has been using crypto to get best possible currency exchange rates for a couple years: source? couldnt find any evidence of this

Coinbase has a healthy relationship with the SEC: healthy enough to earn them a $6.5M fine for illegal wash trading yesterday

Re: Visa Plans to Enable Bitcoin Payments at 70M Merchants

#524

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I ran across the following observation a little while ago: the volatility of one's currency should be less than the volatility of the goods purchased by that currency .

Sounds good, but does it hold true in practice? Should the average price of a dozen eggs be more volatile than $USD? I don’t think that’s the case historically.

Some goods are more volatile than others, and probably tend to be commodities (e.g., oil/WTI) rather than finished goods, but US$ (and the currencies of most developed economies) is less volatile than any good that I can think of.

Re: Visa Plans to Enable Bitcoin Payments at 70M Merchants

#525
post #491

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The other part is that it is not easy to directly trade USDT for USD. Kraken is the only place you can do so directly, it is the only place the peg is directly tested. Apart from that to get USD you need to trade to something else, like BTC or ETH, and then sell that for dollars. What do you mean? I trade USDC and USDT from and to Fiat using Binance, and it's a breeze. I get the funds directly on my bank account in…

Interesting I was under the impression you couldn’t. Does Binance have a USDT/USD trading pair? If not, what are the mechanics of trading from USDT to fiat?

Hey, I didn't see your reply, sorry! But yes, Binance does have a USDT/USD trading pair. Then you just withdraw to your bank account (the mechanics of this vary by country).

Re: Visa Plans to Enable Bitcoin Payments at 70M Merchants

#526

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is a bitcoin account?

An address that owns Bitcoins.

So that metric is really bad because almost every Bitcoin wallet only uses each address once, for privacy reasons. Most of those bottom 98% of addresses probably have very small amounts and are just a small part of someones wallet.

Re: Visa Plans to Enable Bitcoin Payments at 70M Merchants

#527
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Satoshi said in 2009: "The existing Visa credit card network processes about 15 million Internet purchases per day worldwide. Bitcoin can already scale much larger than that with existing hardware for a fraction of the cost. It never really hits a scale ceiling. If you're interested, I can go over the ways it would cope with extreme size." "By Moore's Law, we can expect hardware speed to be 10 times faster in 5 years…

Then came the bitcoin core wars. Today bitcoin is a technological dead end, unable to evolve.

Bitcoin cash?

Re: Visa Plans to Enable Bitcoin Payments at 70M Merchants

#528

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Satoshi said in 2009: "The existing Visa credit card network processes about 15 million Internet purchases per day worldwide. Bitcoin can already scale much larger than that with existing hardware for a fraction of the cost. It never really hits a scale ceiling. If you're interested, I can go over the ways it would cope with extreme size." "By Moore's Law, we can expect hardware speed to be 10 times faster in 5 years…

Well, this is one thing that he obviously got wrong. Computer hardware speed didn't become faster by a factor of 100 in the 12 years since Bitcoin started. Just by a factor of 2, maybe. But solutions to that problem exist. I pay small amounts regularly with my bitcoin wallet (the Wallet of Satoshi), it costs mere cents and transactions confirm in seconds. It's far superior to anything visa has to offer, because it's…

I think in some respect it has. Parallelisation, we have more cores and GPU hardware than before. Its just the frequency that we haven't been able to. Besides POW is easy to parallelize.

Re: Visa Plans to Enable Bitcoin Payments at 70M Merchants

#529
post #370

Isn’t the whole idea of decentralized digital currency systems to eliminate intermediaries, maximize privacy and reduce transaction costs? The visa network stands to lose the most, get seriously disrupted, more they are scrambling to stay relevant and frame this as a value added service.

Lose the most? If people are moving onto Visa's Bitcoin network for some inexplicable reason then Visa is clearly winning because customers aren't fleeing into a competing startup.

The threat to visa is the crypto block chains disinter-mediates their incredibly profitable duopolies.

Re: Visa Plans to Enable Bitcoin Payments at 70M Merchants

#530

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is scarcity a value add? The difficulty and costs associated with getting money into and out of the ecosystem have to offset the scarcity value add. I'm still not convinced that scarcity is valuable. It surely benefits the people who were early adopters but what is the value to new investors? Not to mention how incredibly inefficient all of this is.

Scarcity simply means that someone can't print more units of the store of value, or dig it out of the ground. When someone other than you is doing something like that, your share of wealth is being whittled away. With scarcity, you can maintain your purchasing power indefinitely. You don't have to jump through hoops to find the best rates, or find the best return, etc. Your wealth is simply preserved

Why is the underlying asset valuable? If I create a crypto that only has ten tokens is it more valuable than BTC? It's scarcer than BTC...
Post reply on HN