Earlier quoted context omitted.
> So the book argues that when developing countries are pressured into free trade agreements This should have been obvious since the Opium Wars and the Opening of Japan (see Commodore Matthew Perry). All developed countries are pro free trade for markets where they are strong and fiercely protectionist where they are not (or they consider those markets strategic priorities). I'm from Romania. Romania joined the EU in…
WW3 was fought with soft power and economics. Now some countries own other countries and nobody is complaining.
Ghana will no longer sell cocoa to Switzerland
51–60 of 437 posts
Re: Ghana will no longer sell cocoa to Switzerland
#52This is similar to the situation with Global South coffee exports, wherein actual growers only receive a fraction of the revenue from consumer sales (despite the relatively cheap and easy value-add of roasting or conversion into instant coffee) because of logistical concerns, and because Europeans and American just plain do not buy African roast coffee when it appears on their shelves. If these countries were to deci…
This is a pretty minor point, but any proper coffee geek will tell you that the shelf life of roasted coffee is pretty bad. Thus it makes sense to roast closer to the time when the coffee is made available for sale; shipping from African countries up to Europe, would increase the "latency" a great deal. I'm sure modern packaging gives a decent shelf life, and TBH I don't worry much about the use-before label on coffe…
Re: Ghana will no longer sell cocoa to Switzerland
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
>"we should allow developing countries" Not to pick on you, but I often hear this frasing in the 'first world' and surely you dont 'allow' or 'disallow' internal policies to an sovereign nation? It sounds like a Freudianslip or something, the reality is that its easy to bully or bribe officials in developing nations.
Free trade is usually done on a tit-for-tat basis. I think the GP is saying they should allow protectionist policies without "tatting".
The reason these countries were allowed to do it where others are not was because the US wanted strategically placed powerful allies in the region.
There probably wouldn't be a Japanese electronics/car industry, for instance, if the Soviets hadn't spooked the the US in the 40s.
Re: Ghana will no longer sell cocoa to Switzerland
#54Re: Ghana will no longer sell cocoa to Switzerland
#55It’s interesting to me how much tasty and interesting stuff in Africa has not been marketed internationally and there’s lots of room for them to grow and develop.
For example, fonio [0], is a grain native to west Africa that I’ve never seen in the US but was eaten every day when I was there, as common as rice. It’s gluten-free and could be the next quinoa and a great opportunity to develop a new brand and export finished products rather than just commodities.
One of the big opportunities of all this digitization, I think, is that it’s now easier for remote locations to get more value out of their commodities than just exporting raw and having someone else add most of the value.
I’m surprised the Swiss aren’t trying to do more joint ventures to develop chocolate making capabilities in Ghana.
Re: Ghana will no longer sell cocoa to Switzerland
#56I'm reading the book The Divide at the moment. It makes the argument that it takes time and the right conditions to build up an industry - infrastructure needs to be built, education and a skilled labor pool with the necessary know-how as well. To begin with, a fledgling industry in a developing country cannot compete with those of already industrialized countries - these are already so effective that they can underc…
So Saudi Arabia, UAE, Canada and Saudi Arabia are 'stuck' selling natural resources? I think it's probably a much better plant to extract a good deal of wealth from the natural resource and invest it in other areas of higher value creation, even in the same vertical. There's a good chance that Ghana's policies are needlessly constrained. More obviously there are 100 things Ghana could do to improve living conditions…
> Ghana doesn't have all of the layers of industry necessary to support development and export of products i.e. there are no market buyers at any reasonable price.
Per the article, they literally control half of the world's cocoa. This means they get to define what "a reasonable price" is, as long as the rest of the world wants to keep its chocolate plentiful.
I'm not a politician or economist - but to me, it seems obvious the plan here is to bootstrap domestic cocoa processing industries, get the current exporters to sell cocoa to domestic producers, and export processed products (like chocolate). They're not going to just stop cultivating cocoa - being in control of half of the supply of raw materials for a highly prized product is their one big leverage on the international market.
As to not having the necessary industry base to pull it off - the question is, how fast can they build one? I'd guess a couple of years, if no foreign powers try to make it hard for them.
Re: Ghana will no longer sell cocoa to Switzerland
#57I'm reading the book The Divide at the moment. It makes the argument that it takes time and the right conditions to build up an industry - infrastructure needs to be built, education and a skilled labor pool with the necessary know-how as well. To begin with, a fledgling industry in a developing country cannot compete with those of already industrialized countries - these are already so effective that they can underc…
>"we should allow developing countries" Not to pick on you, but I often hear this frasing in the 'first world' and surely you dont 'allow' or 'disallow' internal policies to an sovereign nation? It sounds like a Freudianslip or something, the reality is that its easy to bully or bribe officials in developing nations.
Forget about the third-world, right now the USA is not-allowing Germany the right to build a pipeline with Russia!
First-world - check, sovereign - check, allies - check.
Re: Ghana will no longer sell cocoa to Switzerland
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
So Saudi Arabia, UAE, Canada and Saudi Arabia are 'stuck' selling natural resources? I think it's probably a much better plant to extract a good deal of wealth from the natural resource and invest it in other areas of higher value creation, even in the same vertical. There's a good chance that Ghana's policies are needlessly constrained. More obviously there are 100 things Ghana could do to improve living conditions…
By itself, it's probably not a good idea. If the government supports the development of a chocolate production industry, including support for cocoa exporters, then it has every chance of success.
Re: Ghana will no longer sell cocoa to Switzerland
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
> So Saudi Arabia, UAE, Canada and Saudi Arabia are 'stuck' selling natural resources? Canada maybe not so much, but Saudi Arabia and the UAE? Yeah, and I think they understand that as well. If we have a fusion breakthrough next year, what will Saudi Arabia export besides Wahhabism?
The Saudi royal family is busy buying as much of Silicon Valley as they can, to ensure they can still live atop a mountain of cash once the oil runs out. As for the rest of the country - yeah, they are royally fucked (pun intended) since no other industry than oil was ever developed.
Re: Ghana will no longer sell cocoa to Switzerland
#60That seems like bigger news than the headline.