Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, if the evil side can exploit this phenomenon to great success (e.g. drone strikes allowing to kill people halfway across the world, and making it feel like playing a video game from 1990s), why can't the good side? We can despair about the nature of man all we want, but if in the meantime, we can get rich people here to spend a lot of money on helping people far away, that's still a huge net benefit for the wor…
Is it really evil to use drones to kill evil people?
WallStreetBets members adopt 3,500 gorillas in six days
191–200 of 321 posts
Re: WallStreetBets members adopt 3,500 gorillas in six days
#192Generic question: I see a lot of news articles stating that WSB has "10 million members". Does being a 'member' go beyond clicking the 'join' button on that subreddit? If so it's more like a 'follow this channel', isn't it?
Re: WallStreetBets members adopt 3,500 gorillas in six days
#193Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not that much compared to other direct or indirect causes.
Uh... Selling a single token? 8.7MWh[1] That's slightly less than the average US household consumes in a year. [1] https://www.wired.com/story/nfts-hot-effect-earth-climate/
The energy is spent to secure the network regardless of how many transactions are processed (in practice, transaction volume is pretty much fixed in terms of "bytes of transactions")
Re: WallStreetBets members adopt 3,500 gorillas in six days
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can someone get busy wrapping endangered species as NFT's and direct the funds accordingly, timing seems about right...
NFT doesen't work like that. After minting it has nothing to do with the initial cause. It could work if they released and auctioned new NFT for each gorilla periodically.
Re: WallStreetBets members adopt 3,500 gorillas in six days
#195Just to put this in perspective, the global population of mountain gorillas is 1,063, so this represents the symbolic adoption of over 3 times the mountain gorillas alive in the wild! I hope this unexpected boon in capital will allow for some meaningful work in preserving and protecting these rare animals. It would be an interesting footnote in history if we can look back in 50 years and draw a line between an intern…
Re: WallStreetBets members adopt 3,500 gorillas in six days
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not that much compared to other direct or indirect causes.
Uh... Selling a single token? 8.7MWh[1] That's slightly less than the average US household consumes in a year. [1] https://www.wired.com/story/nfts-hot-effect-earth-climate/
In reality, bushmeat consumption, logging, farming, and mining are the main drivers or gorilla population losses.
Re: WallStreetBets members adopt 3,500 gorillas in six days
#197Re: WallStreetBets members adopt 3,500 gorillas in six days
#198Allocate some of that to a Harambe memorial. The rest to habitat nurturing and protection.
This is pretty much what they're already doing. It's all a throwback to a meme. Meme "investors" turned meme "philanthropists"
Re: WallStreetBets members adopt 3,500 gorillas in six days
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
"adoption" is the terminology used by the foundation, and symbolic adoption is a known quantity in this type of operation so I don't have a problem with it. However referring to wallstreet bets users as "investors" does seem like a bit of a misnomer...
"Adoption" is fine on the foundation website with context. Here my first thought was that this is some crazy Tiger King scenario.
Some people see "animal adoption" and think about how you can sponsor a critter at your local zoo.
Some people see "animal adoption" and see hillbilly tailer park side show TV shows.
I guess it's all in your life experiences.