Because people would steal them the way they steal towels and other things in hotel rooms? It'd be a crackhead's paradise -- find the nearest hotel, break two room windows in, and score a cool $600 worth of electronics in a few minutes. Score!
Why Don’t Hotels Use Roombas?
11–20 of 26 posts
Re: Why Don’t Hotels Use Roombas?
#12Because people would steal them the way they steal towels and other things in hotel rooms? It'd be a crackhead's paradise -- find the nearest hotel, break two room windows in, and score a cool $600 worth of electronics in a few minutes. Score!
Why don't they do that now for the TVs or the fine art?
Re: Why Don’t Hotels Use Roombas?
#13Why Don't 99%+ of Americans use Roombas?
My primary reason is that they get stuck on cords easily, and I have too many of those to be worth the hassle of concealing.
Re: Why Don’t Hotels Use Roombas?
#14Because vacuuming is <5% of what cleaning people do. You'd need an auto-emptying robot too, which is much harder to make. And you'd need to make it much more reliable - drastically increasing the life of the product. That's very hard.
Re: Why Don’t Hotels Use Roombas?
#15Why Don't 99%+ of Americans use Roombas?
Because they are expensive and inefficient. They're largely novelty. My primary reason is that they get stuck on cords easily, and I have too many of those to be worth the hassle of concealing.
You're one geek with a lot of cords. Most people aren't like you...
Re: Why Don’t Hotels Use Roombas?
#16Vacuuming a hotel is a fundamentally different engineering problem than vacuuming a house in a similar way that a dish washer for a restaurant is different than for a home. The washer from where I worked was a large industrial box that worked hard and fast. A home unit would have to conserve energy and water where as the industrial unit doesn't necessarily. Customers need clean dishes NOW more than the business needs…
It wouldn't have to be as fast as a human because it doesn't need to be watched and a maid could carry multiple of them. (In fact given their battery life, she'd have to.) She could clean room 1, release roomba 1 in it after she was done, move on to clean room 2 while roomba 1 worked, release roomba 2 after the end, etc. There might be a little lag at the end of the shift though, depending on the amount of time the R…
The only way to find out is to actually run a simulation. I don't think a cleaner would have to carry multiple robots, just multiple batteries.
Re: Why Don’t Hotels Use Roombas?
#17Wow, that is a stupid idea. http://mattmaroon.com/?p=416
Agreed. Most people use Roombas for entertainment purposes. It definitely takes more time to look after them than it would to do a better job with a vacuum. I bought one for my wife. I kind of think of it as a pet.
When you say look after them, what do you mean? I clean the brushes out about once a month and that takes a short while. The bin seems to need emptying about as often.
Re: Why Don’t Hotels Use Roombas?
#18Re: Why Don’t Hotels Use Roombas?
#19Because people would steal them the way they steal towels and other things in hotel rooms? It'd be a crackhead's paradise -- find the nearest hotel, break two room windows in, and score a cool $600 worth of electronics in a few minutes. Score!
Why don't they do that now for the TVs or the fine art?
Re: Why Don’t Hotels Use Roombas?
#20Why Don't 99%+ of Americans use Roombas?
mattmaroon (see blog post above) appears to be unable to follow the instructions included with the Roomba, so he doesn't like his. This is interesting because this is the same argument ("it's too hard") you hear about other cool things, like emacs, vi, CL, etc.
Anyway, I like mine. I start it when I shower and I emerge to have a clean apartment. I have a small apartment, though. Yes, it needs to be emptied every few days (and the cat hair removed from the brushes), but that takes all of 5 minutes -- much less time than vacuuming manually would have required. (The reality is that when I didn't have a Roomba, I just never vacuumed. Gross.)