Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is no way to moderate the entire world. The sooner everyone alive accepts this, the better off we will be. The values of a Black lesbian female software developer who grew up in San Francisco and went to Stanford will never be compatible with the values of a Hispanic straight male Marine officer who grew up in San Antonio and went to Texas Christian University and has been deployed to 17 different countries. Ho…
What's wrong with the good old method, "separate communities"? A group of people talking about sports will reject (or moderate) people who want to talk about latest programming languages. A group of people talking about computer-related stuff will downvote and flag non-computer news about latest sport game. The global discussion forum without any moderation does not live long. We can moderate the entire world if we s…
Tweeting “Memphis” autolocks your Twitter account
331–340 of 351 posts
Re: Tweeting “Memphis” autolocks your Twitter account
#332Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is a well-known recipe against trolls: do not feed them. Block and ignore them. If you visit a bathroom, you normally don't bloviate about the kind of crap you had just to flush, you rather avoid the topic; the same applies to trolls. Bring zero attention to them. Trolls' game is all about drawing attention, in the form of ire, offense, and and panic. Deprive them this, and they'll cease to bother you much. Thi…
Blocking, muting, or ignoring a handful of people may work. But when you have hundreds or thousands or more people harassing you, blocking them all isn't practical or sufficient. Get enough people mad at you and you'll end up being SWATted or doxxed (or turned in to deepfake porn). At some point the trolls start feeding each other. Next thing you know we end up with another gamergate (which started because some dude…
Re: Tweeting “Memphis” autolocks your Twitter account
#333Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the parent might have been sarcastic. Hard to tell in text only. I read the last line as "pOlIcInG hAtE sPeEch" with USA being the butt of the joke.
Yes, I was being sarcastic. Missed adding a /s
I presumed you were arguing that it is a hypocricy to criticise "repressive government moderation" on one hand while supporting "policing hate speech" on the other.
I would argue that it's possible to consistently support the latter whilst condemning the former. It's simply a debate about when a neccesary evil slips over the line into something worse.
Re: Tweeting “Memphis” autolocks your Twitter account
#334Earlier quoted context omitted.
I lost my Discord account for daring to use the "change your e-mail address" feature. Nothing warned me that this was a potentially-destructive action. It happens.
A year or two ago I went through every online account I have to change the email address. I should have kept a record of results. Some were good and easy. Some had no option other than an account closure. Some involved a single contact of support without any real verification that I was actually the account holder. Some involved a protracted string of contact with support that tried to claim I was asking for an impos…
Re: Tweeting “Memphis” autolocks your Twitter account
#335Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am not sure I understand your claim... there are many global-scale companies that do moderate their entire site... Google, Reddit, Amazon. Are you trying to make a more specific claim than your post lets on? Maybe that it’s impossible to moderate without making some concession you don’t prefer? Or it’s impossible to moderate away certain kinds of things?
You're going to use Reddit as an example, where the people least deserving of power are given it, freely, and end up banning people for merely having different opinions? I would not have used that in my list. It doesn't boil down to a "concession I don't prefer". The only thing you moderate are those things deemed illegal by the Federal government, anything else is fair game, which brings us a pretty large umbrella o…
I'm guessing you mean the US Federal government, not the Federal government of China, or any of the many others around the world. For a global network, why should the US government's rules be more important than others? Or should networks be restricted to one country only?
Re: Tweeting “Memphis” autolocks your Twitter account
#336Earlier quoted context omitted.
The moderation by Russian government isn’t something I would wish to any culture.
The US is already at Soviet levels: https://taibbi.substack.com/p/the-sovietization-of-the-ameri...
Re: Tweeting “Memphis” autolocks your Twitter account
#337Earlier quoted context omitted.
The US is already at Soviet levels: https://taibbi.substack.com/p/the-sovietization-of-the-ameri...
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about? Soviet level ? Not even close, not even in the same-universe-close. Please learn something about what the life in USSR was really like.
But from talking to people who were living in the USSR as adults through the 70s and 80s (and my own memories of the USSR in the 80s, though I was not an adult, and reading I have done, but I put more weight on the in-person conversations with people I know and who can give me direct first-hand comparisons), the US is certainly same-universe close at this point, and rapidly getting closer, in terms of things like public confessions, limiting acceptable points of view (in _parts_ of the US, segregated by culture) etc. In some aspect, "further along", heading for Cultural Revolution era China. The practical implications are unfortunately not as different as one might like.
Maybe a clearer way to describe it is that the "lived experience" (again, limited to certain professions or locations in the US) is unfortunately far too similar, even while the legal and social structures that produce it are quite different in their details.
And just make sure we're on the same page: the US now is nothing like _1930s_ USSR. We should make sure we mean the same thing when we say "life in the USSR", because it varied quite a bit over 70 years.
Re: Tweeting “Memphis” autolocks your Twitter account
#338In general it seems like moderating platforms with millions/billions of users is a fool's errand, but is required to be attempted due to the level of centralization we've ended up with. Regardless of how much of it is automated away via blackbox ML algorithms lacking transparency or via outsourcing to cheap labor that spends their days looking at terribly offensive and shocking content, the end result is going to hav…
Re: Tweeting “Memphis” autolocks your Twitter account
#339Ugh...I have a HN Twitter bot that just tried to post this and it got locked. https://www.twitter.com/hackernewstop10
Re: Tweeting “Memphis” autolocks your Twitter account
#340Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t know how this relates to the twitter thingy, but it was a useful read, thanks! A relevant tag: #devops
swiftonsecurity speculated that whoever banned “Memphis” meant to ban something like “123 Example Street, Memphis”, but hit an edge case in the parser or screwed up a regex or something. My thought is that the message “you’re about to ban 123,456 users, please confirm how many users you’re ready to ban” would have been a useful safeguard.