Earlier quoted context omitted.
It reinforces black is bad and white is good. Also, deny list and allow list are more precise terms anyway.
>Also, deny list and allow list are more precise terms anyway. Are they? Black/whitelist feels way more natural to me. You can also say things like "blacklisted this ip" instead of "adding to the deny list" or something.
Gitlab default branch name changes to main
231–240 of 294 posts
Re: Gitlab default branch name changes to main
#232Re: Gitlab default branch name changes to main
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's actually an interesting cultural and language difference. Being Russian, I never thought about the offense meaning of the word "master" in English, at least in this context. The reason is that in Russia word "master" ("мастер") means something like "an expert in his field", usually referred to professionals. It seems that it has the same Latin root but evolved into a different meaning. So the Russian meaning i…
Another usage of "maestro" in Italian is in "muro maestro" meaning the "load-bearing wall", which is quite apt for git.
Re: Gitlab default branch name changes to main
#234Earlier quoted context omitted.
Good for you that you found something that works for you. But why the random length restrictions to 4 chars, seems kind of outdated? Also, how does using only a "next" branch for development scale for teams (maybe using a fork-based workflow?). While I use a similar approach like yours on my personal projects, I still prefer the widely known and battle proven Git-Flow when working on agile teams: - master - develop (…
Git flow doesn't care what you call your branches.
Re: Gitlab default branch name changes to main
#235Earlier quoted context omitted.
It reinforces black is bad and white is good. Also, deny list and allow list are more precise terms anyway.
>Also, deny list and allow list are more precise terms anyway. Are they? Black/whitelist feels way more natural to me. You can also say things like "blacklisted this ip" instead of "adding to the deny list" or something.
Re: Gitlab default branch name changes to main
#236Reminds me of something Martin Luther King (MLK) said after he started the second phase of his activism. Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts had been passed 1964 and 1965 respectively, so MLK started to agitate for economic opportunities and equality. He noted that this would be the harder fight because allowing people to vote costs nothing. It was during this phase of his activism that he was assassinated.
Changing the name of your repo means little and is not a substitute for looking deeply at your organization and asking the hard questions. You can call your repo Conan the Barbarian conqueror of all, or master. It doesn't matter to me.
Edit
Can I just add that IMO overcoming bias can only be achieved by individual effort. No amount of talk about diversity and equality by the company will fix the problem if any persons involved in the hiring process has biases and preferences rooted in ethnicity. If diversity initiatives were sufficient Google would be a more diverse place today. Not faulting them for trying though.
My experience: I once interviewed a candidate who was much older than the rest of the team and I could see ageism welling up in me as soon as I met him. I had to consciously blind myself to the age of the candidate and forced myself to consider the him on merit only. Turns out the guy was great, and I agreed with the team that he would be a good hire. All I ask is not to look at the color or my skin but only on what I know. And do not offer me a job that I cannot do just because you want to be diverse.
Re: Gitlab default branch name changes to main
#237Re: Gitlab default branch name changes to main
#238I'm African and I think these name changes are ludicrous. Why not fix the (hopefully unconscious) hiring biases that surely exist in big tech that ends up hiring overwhelmingly male candidates of European and Asian origin? Reminds me of something Martin Luther King (MLK) said after he started the second phase of his activism. Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts had been passed 1964 and 1965 respectively, so MLK start…
Re: Gitlab default branch name changes to main
#239Earlier quoted context omitted.
That doesn't infer the same relationship of dependency, but infers a parallel independent relationship. Not the same thing.
Primary / Replica.
And a master does not even need a slave (like in the github case) - so git's master is not even like the master (who had slaves) that people are offended about.