> Some of the risks are positively futuristic: they compete against decentralized exchange-like platforms, where market-makers trade directly with users. In a way, this is like any other software company that nominally competes against open-source clones; Adobe users could switch to Gimp, and Microsoft could hypothetically lose revenue due to OpenOffice. But the decentralized entities Coinbase competes against can have a life of their own even if they're not updated or maintained; Coinbase, a company with over a thousand employees, competes against incorporeal techno-economic zombies.
I dont think that this is what open source is about. I dont think that comparing Microsoft and OpenOffice is a relevant statement. I mean at least one means LibreOffice, and furthermore there is no competition to Microsoft, they satisfy different objectives.
Secondly, decentralization is not about moving business value from one entity to 'the masses,' it is about agreeing to a protocol and establishing that protocol in a trustless implementation.