Live data from Hacker News

Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

reddit.com

211–220 of 326 posts

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they build a unified notification inbox, I will pay for that. I had one of those when I used a Blackberry and I miss it as I now have to check 10 sites periodically to stay on top of things.

Honestly, the last thing I want is a unified inbox. I get inputs from a dozen different streams and have segregated them by platform to better manage my time. I want it to be really easy for people to get a hold of me if the information is important or if they are important to me, e.g. via SMS or voice. I want it to be very difficult to be overwhelmed by low signal content unless that is my focus at the time, e.g. ma…

Agreed. Slack + Outlook is for work, Whatsapp/Messenger is for friends, Gmail for personal stuff.

The last thing I want is for all of those to be jammed into one app.

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#213
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the best example is when Dropbox was announced and how many people scoffed at the triviality of cloning data around.

For me that's still what it's best at and what it should focus on. "Paper", Signatures, Password, to me that feels like they're desperately trying to find something to not just be a reliable external hard drive for people. Oh and of course their number one ambition, trying to convince me to upgrade to whatever more expensive plan they have.

Dropbox has the best sync clients, but that's not enough to save them from being a commodity. Dead-simple and reliable sync seems like a nice-to-have that isn't going to save them from the incredibly large footprint the likes of Microsoft already have in enterprise markets. An IT purchaser might not care much about the usability difference between OneDrive and DropBox (which I'm not even sure exists since the last time I used both.)

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#214
post #203
post #13

Literally every time you see a startup release a product that seems trivial it's because that's not the full story. You're judging without complete information. For example, the public face might be a simple Mac calendar widget, but that could be the gateway to calendar sharing, native office apps, meeting booking, event management, ticket sales, corporate flight sales etc. Building an audience with a cheap tool that…

>most businesses do far more than you can see from the outside It’s enough that they made it into YC to conclude that there is a lot more going inside. They filled out an application and had to have many milestones hit before they were accepted... Regarding focusing on a niche it was a lesson I learned when I was filtering startups for investments I wrote about about my lesson before and how dumb I felt for passing o…

> They filled out an application and had to have many milestones hit before they were accepted...

Plenty of people get into YC with nothing more than an idea.

Getting into YC is sort of like getting into Harvard. Yeah, lots of people there are impressive, but not all of them. YC doesn't have a perfect filter.

FWIW I got into YC without anything remotely resembling a business, and I don't think I'm that impressive. My company failed almost immediately.

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't get when people say $X/month is too much. Too much for you maybe. But for me, if I can save 1 hour per month, that's worth $500. That's the top of what I've charged per hour for some consulting gigs. So $10/m is literally nothing for me if I can save time. Time is your most valuable asset. Money is nothing. Focus on time.

Great, I'm hoping you'll sign up for my upcoming weather widget which tells you the weather in a single location. It's only $30 a month, and it will save you time as you will no longer have to use any other weather widget. At some point in the future I plan on offering additional locations (at a compellingly low per location monthly service fee TBD).

As great as the endless possibilities software offers are, it really obscures the amount of effort necessary to bring real world products to life. The jump in hubris from “Great, I can code!” to “Well, I could build a tool to do that, so no one deserves to make a living/profit/native app/business doing it” is waaaay too prevalent around here.

Of course none of the people who say such things could actually do so. Instead, they continue to post the aforementioned type of comment along with the following:

- Ask HN: Where are all the profitable ideas? - Show HN: I built some half-assed idea that no one will ever use to learn the latest technology fad. - Who’s Hiring: I hate my job at some random SaaS firm because I hypocritically don’t assign worth to building software.

Anyhow, where is this mythical weather widget getting its data? How reliable are its forecasts? What makes it better than the tools Apple/Google build into their OSes after spending millions acquiring formerly indie weather tools?

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they build a unified notification inbox, I will pay for that. I had one of those when I used a Blackberry and I miss it as I now have to check 10 sites periodically to stay on top of things.

What's wrong with the existing notification inbox in macos? It's available quicker, by just swiping in from the right side.

And you can add calendar, todo, notes, etc etc widgets to it. It is slow and you can’t use the keyboard to navigate it. I think developers are very limited in what they can do with it. That said, it covers 80% of what users are looking for here ...

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve spent almost a decade in the productivity space (founded Shortcuts at Apple, fka Workflow) and everything is always confusing. Everyone is seeking the holy grail of computing (“the computer does exactly what I want and it’s a seamless experience”) and there are a billion and a half ways to attack the problem. Starting with a “hair on fire” problem and expanding to other hair on fire problems is not a wholly unre…

Sure, but saving a click or two when joining zoom meetings for mac users that don't use the native calendar app doesn't really scream "hair on fire"...

I ended up building my own solution to this because I regularly miss meetings by minutes and want a one-click solution to jump into meetings (I can have up to 10 a day) even though I use the native Calendar app.

I saw this and it resonated deeply with me. It's an exceedingly small paper cut, but a paper cut nonetheless.

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#218

Jesus Christ people. Give it a break. I hate this Reddit post. You're not going to build the next Apple today by making your first product a full fledged competitive modern computer. Remember that Microsoft started with a BASIC interpreter. Apple themselves started with a niche computer back then that sold to less 500 hobbyists at a hobbyist computer shop. The next Apple would also have to build something extremely n…

You are absolutely right, and personally, I'm a huge fan of these tiny niche products that do one thing really well. However, ask yourself this: is the next Apple applying (or going to apply) to YC? My guess is probably not.

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#219
post #173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dropbox could have carved out a niche for itself as a platform for backup and sharing of files. However, the amount of investment capital doesn't allow them to be just a successful medium sized enterprise.

> Dropbox could have carved out a niche for itself as a platform for backup and sharing of files Serious question - hasn't it? I know there are other players in the space, but it's absolutely the #1 solution I think of.

Being the best in a completely commodified area is tough, especially when that solution set is thrown in for free in the world's most popular productivity platforms-- Office 365.

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you want a crazy win, then you have to invest in some crazy things. Crazy simple also makes sense. YC is doing what they were created to do. To invest in extremely early stage startups no one is willing to bet on. But maybe their product is questioning a fundamental assumption that is outdated that has not been thrown out yet, given current technological advances. Who knows. You could be right on founders. Founder…

Investing in a calendar widget is not a “crazy idea nobody will bet on” This is something that’s easily bootstrapped and which can be run as a lifestyle business at best.

I don't understand why people hate on calendar apps so much. They are also not there yet.

My definition of an ideal calendar app is it would set the meetings I need for the right amount of time with the right people. It will obtain theoretical correct schedule S that maximizes my happiness and satisfaction on earth.

The design space is huge. Maybe cutting edge tech can help us get closer to the scheduler that we all need.

Post reply on HN