Live data from Hacker News

Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

reddit.com

101–110 of 326 posts

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#101
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apologies in advance for the nitpick, but if you're just dropping your product and doing something else that's not really a pivot. Pivoting is more like changing your plan than throwing it out - targeting a different audience, changing your product plan based on feedback, that sort of thing.

I’d call changing the entire plan a “hard pivot.” I mean Slack started out as a video game (and Flickr - same game IIRC). But as the counter point, here’s an article that argues against doing that in favor of simply shutting down (including comments from a YC partner no less)! https://www.reforge.com/brief/why-hard-pivots-in-startups-ar... In this case though, the company is brand new. There aren’t a lot of employees…

I think it's always fair to criticise somebody's work - after all, starting a company is stepping into the public sphere. I don't know if what they're doing will be successful or not because I presume they've investigated the market more than I have. The proof is in the pudding though - we'll see in a few years if the idea was good or not!

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For the curious : https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sherlocked

Thanks a lot! Could you paste it here? Work firewall blocks that site.

sherlocked

To have developed a product and just started shipping it, only to have Apple come along and provide exactly the same functionality in a system update. It happened to Karelia Software twice. Once with Sherlock and again with iWeb.

I'll bet the Pro HDR folks groaned and got drunk after the Apple event yesterday where they showed the HDR functionality built in to the OS. They got Sherlocked!

by franketh September 02, 2010

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#103
post #34
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They pivoted. It happens. That doesn't tell you anything about what their plans are now.

Just ask AstroPad and f.lux who both have been targets of being 'sherlocked'. I can only see that these guys are at risk of being sherlocked by Calendar.app, Google Calendar and Calendar.exe. Wonder what their answer to YC was when they were asked about that risk.

I commented on this risk. The founder smartly replied that they have much broader plans than just calendars. Still, anything that lives in the menu bar and serves such a core purpose as notifications is at risk of being “Sherlocked”.

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For the curious : https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sherlocked

Thanks a lot! Could you paste it here? Work firewall blocks that site.

sherlocked: to have developed a product and just started shipping it, only to have Apple come along and provide exactly the same functionality in a system update. It happened to Karelia Software twice. Once with Sherlock and again with iWeb.

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#105
post #37
post #13

Literally every time you see a startup release a product that seems trivial it's because that's not the full story. You're judging without complete information. For example, the public face might be a simple Mac calendar widget, but that could be the gateway to calendar sharing, native office apps, meeting booking, event management, ticket sales, corporate flight sales etc. Building an audience with a cheap tool that…

Exactly. Also, if you want to make money selling software to consumers, Apple's platform is the one to target. Mac and iOS users are the most likely by far to actually pay for software. It's far more difficult to sell an app for actual money to Android or Windows users. Again talking specifically about the consumer market here, not enterprise.

This was a marketing myth put out by Apple in the early days of the app store. It's not true.

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#107
I know someone who raised over 50M to improve technical presales. If anyone has ever worked in this context they'll know it's inefficient. First product: a chrome extension that does time tracking. The question is will this succeed because of the money raised, the domain knowledge of the founders, or the quality of the product? Or some combination of the above.

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#108
People misunderstand YC's business model. They invest 125K for a 7% stake in the company. That's a <$2 million valuation. If this company sells a couple thousand (at $120/y), YC breaks even. If they sell a couple million, YC gets back 1000x on their money. It's a great investment.

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#109
post #66

Kind of a ridiculous product to find. When asked why a user needs to pay $10/mo, the answer was “We'd like to fall into the category of other consumer SaaS products” That’s the reason? Just shows how jokes become reality - everything is a subscription because you can squeeze more money that way, not because of actual value.

You can only squeeze more money when there is actual value...otherwise people simply don't pay.

Re: Has Y Combinator lost its way when the latest company is a Mac only widget?

#110
post #13

Literally every time you see a startup release a product that seems trivial it's because that's not the full story. You're judging without complete information. For example, the public face might be a simple Mac calendar widget, but that could be the gateway to calendar sharing, native office apps, meeting booking, event management, ticket sales, corporate flight sales etc. Building an audience with a cheap tool that…

On top of that: doing something that you could hack together 80% of the way over a weekend, but then providing careful attention to detail in terms of user experience and integrations, quality and responsive customer support, and a general intimate awareness of your customers' needs can make it into a valuable product. Many products could be dramatically amplified in their usefulness by way of a couple tiny UX tweaks, driven by understanding of users' problems. In fact this is a main factor in Apple's success, IMO.
Post reply on HN