Live data from Hacker News

Write Simply

paulgraham.com

281–290 of 354 posts

Re: Write Simply

#281
It's too bad that an article about "simple writing" is so hard to read. It has "simple" words, but it's clunky. Two examples:

"That kind of writing is easier to read, and the easier something is to read, the more deeply readers will engage with it. The less energy they expend on your prose, the more they'll have left for your ideas."

(Why not: "Simple writing makes it easier to engage your ideas.")

"And remember, if you're writing in English, that a lot of your readers won't be native English speakers. Their understanding of ideas may be way ahead of their understanding of English."

(Why not: "Don't make your ideas difficult to understand.")

Re: Write Simply

#282
post #65

Reminds me of the Swedish journalist Sigge Ågren who received multiple awards for his work in forming a style in Swedish journalism, he's well known for the quote "Write concisely. Preferably, not at all". Both the technical field and the academic field (especially the humanities) are plagued with the notion that a complex and therefore "valuable" idea also needs to be expressed in complex terms to be considered valu…

Less to do with insecurity, more to do with signifying membership of a club. A bit like a regimental tie, vocal fry or the latest pair of sneakers.

Re: Write Simply

#283
post #275

I have opinions about writing. So does Mr. Graham. What our opinions have in common is that they are not falsifiable . Unless we validate our conjectures with empirical evidence, we're really just sharing our taste. "Oh no," you may say, "I have tested it, and when I write a longer essay, my retweets and upvotes decline." Very well, but the plural of anecdote is not 'data.' Somewhere else on the Internet, there is so…

For low friction, transfer of ideas, Graham is right. But sometimes sounding like passport application form instructions doesn’t get the right feeling across.

Words have a magic about them, and I don’t think Paul Graham would dispute that.

Re: Write Simply

#284
"It's too much to hope that writing could ever be pure ideas. You might not even want it to be. But for most writers, most of the time, that's the goal to aim for. The gap between most writing and pure ideas is not filled with poetry."

When I was a teenager I was waiting in the kitchen for my mom to do something. I was in a bad mood and frustrated at having to wait, and and I resigned myself to staring at a bit of artwork my mother had recently put up - one of Andy Warhol's soup cans, and I determined that I would stare at nothing but this stupid picture until I found something interesting about it. After a moment or two I thought that it was interesting how tragic it was that in our society a master artist spent his time illustrating... soup cans.

Even as I was completing the thought, it struck me, like a truck, that this may have been exactly the intended message. That some graphic designer, who might have the soul of an artist, would have to earn a living doing the iconography on a soup can - for no higher purpose than crass commercialism, and even that wouldn't be original, but mass produced by machines and assembly lines - that in our society art itself was subsumed by capitalism.

That was the first moment that I realized art might be more than pretty pictures. In my own home office I have that same picture now. It reminds me of a lot of thoughts - the memory of that realization, striving against creativity enslaved by capitalism, and my own mother.

I bring this up because I think there is some sense in which "poetry" can separate writing from meaning, but there is another way in which poetry, or abstract expression like art, can encode meaning that simple and direct communication cannot hope to.

In college I heard a poem that went "The apparition of these faces in a crowd; petals on a wet, black, bough". I still don't know exactly what that feeling is, but I feel that way from time to time and recite that poem to myself when I do.

Poetry, or art, is inexact, but I think it is a lot closer to the pure idea form of communication. At least when it works.

Re: Write Simply

#285

Am I the only one not very fond of this style of writing? It's the constant pauses and hiccups that I'm reading. Four paragraphs into it, and I still don't get a lot of information about what the author is trying to convey. In good essays, the first and last sentence in a paragraph are often enough to summarize the points. It helps set the context, and makes it much easier for the reader to make a mental map of the o…

Couldn't agree more - most pieces of writing, especially in the workplace, should optimally have a VERY brief summary introduction, and the complete version should be succinct, but not to the point of

as if

a robot

wrote

it

because it's very

jarring to

read

kind of

like this

Re: Write Simply

#286

Am I the only one not very fond of this style of writing? It's the constant pauses and hiccups that I'm reading. Four paragraphs into it, and I still don't get a lot of information about what the author is trying to convey. In good essays, the first and last sentence in a paragraph are often enough to summarize the points. It helps set the context, and makes it much easier for the reader to make a mental map of the o…

yes, I often find PGs essays too wordy and there's a lot of reading to be done for whatever point/s are being made. I often just start skimming to try and see if I can get to the meat of the essay. This one was actually quite short.

Re: Write Simply

#287

When something feels easy to read, it's not just a matter of using simple words. To maximize scanability, you need to use a mix of long and short words, and also mix long and short sentences, until you achieve a kind of "flow". Famously, Dovlatov's prose (in Russian) avoids having words that start with the same letter in the same sentence, which is unnoticeable to the reader but makes the words just fly off the page.…

Seeing as Akbar was supposedly illiterate, the first interpretation would be doubly hilarious.

Re: Write Simply

#288
Sometimes writing less simple is beneficial when intentional. Know your audience. Less simple writing alienates people. If you wish to preference a particular segment of the general population only, this is one way to do it.

The benefit of that is less noise. A problem in that is some people will get angry and blame you with hostility if they feel stupid and cannot follow the writing.

Re: Write Simply

#289
post #275

I have opinions about writing. So does Mr. Graham. What our opinions have in common is that they are not falsifiable . Unless we validate our conjectures with empirical evidence, we're really just sharing our taste. "Oh no," you may say, "I have tested it, and when I write a longer essay, my retweets and upvotes decline." Very well, but the plural of anecdote is not 'data.' Somewhere else on the Internet, there is so…

Yo, but real talk, didn’t we all just eat his essay up?

No I really dislike Paul Graham and I find his writing style to be extremely grating. I wouldn't have said anything but you asked. I guess I'm in the minority on this one and I'm a hater in general.

Re: Write Simply

#290
post #275

I have opinions about writing. So does Mr. Graham. What our opinions have in common is that they are not falsifiable . Unless we validate our conjectures with empirical evidence, we're really just sharing our taste. "Oh no," you may say, "I have tested it, and when I write a longer essay, my retweets and upvotes decline." Very well, but the plural of anecdote is not 'data.' Somewhere else on the Internet, there is so…

Well said.
Post reply on HN