Live data from Hacker News

Based Cooking

based.cooking

421–430 of 485 posts

Re: Based Cooking

#421

I guess the Proud Boys deserve cookbooks too? The use of the word “based” is almost always a white nationalist whistle or flag. Like flashing the “OK” sign so others know you’re a racist. The first time I saw the word based was the first significant violent attack on a BLM protestor by white supremacist Kyle Chapman in 2017. The Proud Boys klan gave him the honorary title of “Based Stickman”. The author of this cooki…

You call yourself iconoclast...? You're enforcing the orthodoxy...

Re: Based Cooking

#422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Experimentation is part of learning though. Heck, failing is part of learning! We really need to teach kids that just because you fail a few times at something you're not bad at it - it's part of learning.

Failing at chicken parmesan is almost impossible with a decent recipe so the recipe should for most part not be "add a dash of this and add a dash of that, you decide!" It's a fairly predictable dish.

I wouldn't call this a decent recipe, since it doesn't explain how to prepare or incorporate the tomatoes.

Re: Based Cooking

#423

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They list stuff like a "pinch" of salt or a "stick" of butter. I don't understand the complaint here. A stick of butter is half a cup, 8 tablespoons. The standardization is more ironclad than pretty much any other product you can get in a grocery store.

Not everyone on the internet lives in the USA. I have absolutely no idea what a stick of butter is without googling it. UK butter is sold in 250g blocks. A cup means 280ml here, but 237ml in the US. A literal tablespoon varies from 7ml to 25ml, and is defined to be between 14.8ml and 20ml depending on locale. Why not just specify in terms of litres and grams, which are the same everywhere?

> Not everyone on the internet lives in the USA.

So? What we have here is someone whose mother wrote down recipes involving sticks of butter. There's no ambiguity about the amount or the geography.

Re: Based Cooking

#424

> Only Based cooking. Can someone shed light on what "based cooking" is? It's rather tricky to Google for and am unable to figure out what the site's author means by that.

Based is really hard to define if we're being honest. It kind of means a Libertarian sort of self-righteous fearlessness of going against the grain. Like being anti lockdown because lockdowns are unconstitutional? Based. In this example there's a certain macho-ness to this site, there's no fluff, narrative, ads, CSS, or pictures, just recipes, dammit! Based.

Re: Based Cooking

#425

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As European who sometimes cooks recipes from US sites. I have a dedicated set of cup and spoon measures (1) and the sizes in the spoon measures read * tablespoon 15ml * teaspoon 5ml * 1/2 teaspoon 2.5ml * 1/4 teaspoon 1ml (1) not exactly this set, but a similar one https://www.amazon.de/-/en/HAUSPROFI-Stainless-steel-measuri...

I'm European. There is no issue here in what a teaspoon or a tablespoon is. A tablespoon is three times the size of a teaspoon and I have dedicate measuring spoons for each size. The issue is what a "spoonful" constitutes. Check the link to the recipe.

I'm from NY if it matters. When I hear 'spoonful' in a recipe, I generally think of a regular spoon (one for cereal, but not an oversized one) with a heaping amount of whatever the ingredient is. 'spoonful' also implies the quantity is to taste, otherwise they would be more specific.

Re: Based Cooking

#426
post #385
post #363

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A tablespoon is called a tablespoon because table spoons — the medium-sized spoons that come in flatware sets — have a mostly-standardized capacity, and this capacity comes out to around 1tbsp. Why? As it happens, a 1tbsp basin on a utensil, with loose food (e.g. rice, corn, pudding, whatever) heaped atop the basin to its sloughing point, constitutes pretty much exactly a “mouthful” of food (for almost all human skul…

You're not answering the question, the question was simply "what is a spoonful?" The answer is that a "spoonful" is not precisely defined. "Tablespoon" and "teaspoon" are defined measurements, but "spoonful" isn't. The answer from another comment is that the author meant "tablespoon."

Sorry, I wrote a conclusion section for my post as an edit, but I guess I never hit submit on it:

> The idea is that when someone says "spoonful", they mean "one unit of the thing as you'd normally apportion that thing, using the spoon you'd normally use when interacting with that thing."

> So, one "spoonful of sugar" (or most spices) is a teaspoonful, because you use tea spoons when interacting with sugar in everyday life; while one "spoonful of honey" (or soup stock, or reserved pasta water, or any other thing that you only tend interact with in the context of cooking) is a tablespoonful. (Or actually, a wooden-mixing-spoon-ful, since that's what cooks had on hand to measure with — but as it turns out, wooden mixing spoons usually had the same level liquid capacity as table-spoons. The heaping measures weren't equivalent between wooden mixing spoons and tablespoons, though, and this has caused much numerical error when modernizing old recipes!)

Re: Based Cooking

#427
Can duckduckgo or other search engines be customized to only return sites like this, HN, etc... I'm thinking of being able to set parameters like:

1. No tracking pixels/cookies

2. No javascript

3. Load in <1 second

Re: Based Cooking

#428

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On this subject, can an American please tell me what a spoonful is? There is a great video series on youtube, with his recipes online, but all measurements are spoonful: https://www.ethanchlebowski.com/cooking-techniques-recipes/p... Spoons can vary in size, so is it a tablespoon or a teaspoon? When dealing with spices you'll be adding 3 times the amount if you go with tablespoon interpretation so it'd be a pretty bi…

> On this subject, can an American please tell me what a spoonful is? The problem isn't with American conventions. We have no "spoonful" measure any more than you do. That website is not following any American convention by declining to specify its spice amounts.

Also relevant, spice (and salt) preferences have a high subjective component. It drives my wife crazy but I don't even read amounts any more for things like this, I just put whatever I think, and add more if it seems like it needs it after I taste it. Conveniently its also the best, and perhaps only, way to develop in to a good cook because it teaches you how ingredients impact the flavour of your meal, and in turn how that is percieved by the people consuming it.

If its helpful to anyone not well versed in cooking, focus on salt first. IME its by far the most important component in most dishes.

Re: Based Cooking

#429
post #312

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My experience is the opposite. Most bread recipes for example are both incredibly tolerant of mistakes. Also — flour varies so much in capacity to absorb water and gluten content between brands that I'd say precision is very much illusory unless you are after industrial-style consistency. Small changes in how you handle doughs of different hydration, and changes in timing/temperature thereafter have a much bigger dif…

I agree entirely. I feel like this myth of "baking is science, cooking is art" got started and I don't really understand it. 100% reproducible results for both is definitely "science". The processes that happen to make the flavors and textures and results you're looking for - absolutely "science". Some very finicky food types require a lot more precision than others, so some (very small percentage of) recipes you abs…

I also developed intuition after methodically working through a Ruhlman book (Ruhlman's 20, in my case). Just wanted to add it seems to be his style, focusing on imparting intuition rather than recipe mastery. For anyone wanting to become a more intuitive cook, one of his books will carry you very very far.
Post reply on HN