YouTube tells foreign creators they will soon be charged American tax

Post by bin_bash » Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 3:54 PM UTC

tristanj wrote: post #85

This RT article is clickbait and spreading misinformation. The tax is on revenue generated from users in the US, not on all revenue. If creators provide no tax information at all, only then will YouTube tax all global revenue. And YouTube is not doing so by choice, they're a US headquartered company and forced to do this to comply with US tax law. RT is highlighting tweets that are spreading misinformation. For examp…

Post by wasmitnetzen » Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 3:57 PM UTC

radiospiel wrote: post #77

biren34 wrote: post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you live in the EU and work for Google, you probably actually work for Google's EU-based subsidiary. There's no US-based company involved in the relationship. It's confusing because the company treats all the subsidiaries as one whole, while the law treats the subsidiaries as their own entities.

AFAIK this misses the point. If a EU citizen is contracted by a US company, but living in the EU they are not subject to US income tax at all, but only to their own state's - and also this might not be legal if the US corp has a EU subsidiary. (If they live in the US they are taxed by the US first and their home country second, but taxes paid in the US are being deducted from the taxes they have to pay in their home…

Post by sandworm101 » Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 3:57 PM UTC

bin_bash wrote: post #91

tristanj wrote: post #85

This RT article is clickbait and spreading misinformation. The tax is on revenue generated from users in the US, not on all revenue. If creators provide no tax information at all, only then will YouTube tax all global revenue. And YouTube is not doing so by choice, they're a US headquartered company and forced to do this to comply with US tax law. RT is highlighting tweets that are spreading misinformation. For examp…

slightly OT but does anyone recommend journalism from organizations that avoid this sort of misleading information? I'm not sure if I've just become more sensitive to it but recently I feel like I can't get away from it. WSJ (non-opinion) seems to be one of the few places that tends to have accurate headlines IMO.

Post by bitcharmer » Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 3:57 PM UTC

yoz-y wrote: post #40

mrweasel wrote: post #15

That seems like a potentially risky move from YouTube. Won't every other country now demand that they do the same for them? This is going to be extremely confusing for creators. I can't imagine anyone but the very largest YouTubers being able to handle getting taxed in multiple countries and figure out what exactly they need to pay at home. Actually, the large YouTubers may be better of simply demonetizing they video…

How is abiding to the U.S. law, where Google/YouTube is incorporated a "risky move"? It's not like there is a choice. https://support.google.com/youtube/thread/101463270?hl=en

Post by sempron64 » Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 3:59 PM UTC

sandworm101 wrote: post #86

tristanj wrote: post #85

This RT article is clickbait and spreading misinformation. The tax is on revenue generated from users in the US, not on all revenue. If creators provide no tax information at all, only then will YouTube tax all global revenue. And YouTube is not doing so by choice, they're a US headquartered company and forced to do this to comply with US tax law. RT is highlighting tweets that are spreading misinformation. For examp…

"we will soon be updating our Terms of Service where your earnings from YouTube will be considered royalties from a U.S. tax perspective (we’ve already made this change to the Terms of Service for U.S. creators in November). This may impact the way your earnings are taxed, and as required by U.S. law, Google will withhold taxes." So you will have to file a tax return and get the money back just like every other incom…