Hol' up. While in bankruptcy, some fools ran up the price of Hertz stock. Then, while the price was up in the middle of bankruptcy proceedings , Hertz sold some new shares to the same fools. The final result of the bankruptcy wiped out all of the shareholders. While the buyers were obviously fools, Hertz should have known that zero shareholder value was a likely outcome. How was selling more stock in that situation l…
> How was selling more stock in that situation legal? Why should it not be? Consider the following situation: 1. Alice owns 5 shares of Hertz. 2. Hertz owns 5 shares of Hertz. 3. Bob is an ape. For some stupid reason, Bob wants to buy 5 shares of Hertz. Is it immoral or illegal for Alice to sell her 5 shares to Bob? If not, why should it be immoral or illegal for Hertz to do so? Especially if they are up front about…
2. RJ Reynolds owns many cartons of Camels. Reynolds creates a cartoon camel called Joe Camel, who is as recognizable to 6 year olds as Mickey Mouse.
3. Bob is a 11 year old. For some stupid reason, Bob wants to smoke Camels and be cool like Joe.
Is it immoral for Reynolds to sell to an 11 year old? Is it immoral for Alice to sell her cigarettes to Bob?