For the love of god, we get it. What are no-coiners going to complain about when ethereum moves to proof of stake?
Bitcoin network average energy consumption per transaction compared to VISA
31–40 of 110 posts
Re: Bitcoin network average energy consumption per transaction compared to VISA
#32Yeah, but does this compare the cost of creation of the currency? Isn't that what's (fallaciously) being compared here? How much does it cost to create a US dollar, to be able to have transactions with it? Did it take 100 years of faith in the US credit to establish that? How much energy was that?
Re: Bitcoin network average energy consumption per transaction compared to VISA
#33Yeah, but does this compare the cost of creation of the currency? Isn't that what's (fallaciously) being compared here? How much does it cost to create a US dollar, to be able to have transactions with it? Did it take 100 years of faith in the US credit to establish that? How much energy was that?
All that's relevant is what it costs now or else we're going back to the beginning of the universe
Re: Bitcoin network average energy consumption per transaction compared to VISA
#34Re: Bitcoin network average energy consumption per transaction compared to VISA
#35I can setup a dozen nodes on AWS and build a crypto with a million times the transaction capacity of Bitcoin. Obviously the downside to this is centralization; someone can be banned or censoredfor any reason.
Blockchains are first decentralized, permissionless, censorship resistant solutions.
Re: Bitcoin network average energy consumption per transaction compared to VISA
#36If anybody's interested, here is a careful analysis of Bitcoin's carbon foot print (2019): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254243511...
TL;DR: While there is this "energy consumption of Argentina" number in circulation implying Bitcoin's carbon emissions equates that of a whole developed country, in reality this number is closer to that of Kansas City.
Re: Bitcoin network average energy consumption per transaction compared to VISA
#37For the love of god, we get it. What are no-coiners going to complain about when ethereum moves to proof of stake?
Re: Bitcoin network average energy consumption per transaction compared to VISA
#38Yeah, but does this compare the cost of creation of the currency? Isn't that what's (fallaciously) being compared here? How much does it cost to create a US dollar, to be able to have transactions with it? Did it take 100 years of faith in the US credit to establish that? How much energy was that?
It costs about 16 cents to make a $20 bill. https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/currency_12771.htm In truth, if I factor in the establishment of the United States and several hundred years of money policy, it'll be higher. But for a fair comparison with Bitcoin, that'd be unfair, right? Because the US's money policy is obviously historically tied to Britain's, so I should include that too. And Britain was adapting th…
Re: Bitcoin network average energy consumption per transaction compared to VISA
#39Miners load hash rate to get a better chance at the next block, the transactions just go along for the ride.
This would be true regardless of how much hash power is cumulative.
Re: Bitcoin network average energy consumption per transaction compared to VISA
#40I mean, I know people are commenting on whether the comparison is valid, but regardless, the BTC energy cost at at 741 kWh for a single transaction is pretty close to the average monthly household energy usage in the US of 867 kWh [1]. That seems pretty nuts on its face to me. [1] https://electricityplans.com/kwh-kilowatt-hour-can-power/
To put it in perspective, a single bitcoin transaction can power the average american's household electricity needs for... an entire month.