Live data from Hacker News

MIPS Becomes RISC-V

eejournal.com

1–10 of 225 posts

Re: MIPS Becomes RISC-V

#5
This is more or less analogous to Blackberry moving to Android, isn’t it? Storied, old-guard tech company loses most of its market share, trades in its first-party stack for a rising open-source alternative.

Is MIPS still a big enough name to make this much of a coup for RISC-V? Or is this the last-ditch effort of a fallen star of the semi market?

Re: MIPS Becomes RISC-V

#6
My historical skepticism on the acceptance and proliferation of RISC-V looks more antiquated by the day. No real dog in the fight, but I would love to see this take off like ARM did.

Re: MIPS Becomes RISC-V

#8

This is huge. It looks like the only architectures widely-deployed in ten years will be x86, ARM, Power, and RISC-V (maybe also SPARC64 in Japan, although that's rare in the US).

The "not ARM based" MCU market might be interesting to watch as well. Not just for RISC-V, but also as ARM MCUs continue to drop in power needs and unit cost.

Re: MIPS Becomes RISC-V

#9

This is huge. It looks like the only architectures widely-deployed in ten years will be x86, ARM, Power, and RISC-V (maybe also SPARC64 in Japan, although that's rare in the US).

The big innovation in architectures is in the SIMD world.

AVX512 (x86 512-bit), SVE (ARM 512-bit), NVidia PTX / SASS (32x32-bit), AMD RDNA (32x32-bit), AMD CDNA (64x32-bit).

64-bit cores (aka: classic CPUs) are looking like a solved problem, and are becoming a commodity. SIMD compute however, remains an open question. NVidia probably leads today, but there seems to be plenty of room for smaller players.

Heck, one major company (AMD) is pushing 32x32-bit on one market (6xxx series) and 64x32-bit in another market (MI100 / Supercomputers).

Post reply on HN