Live data from Hacker News

Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

bbc.com

101–110 of 428 posts

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#101

You should always try to have your personal website, as it's almost the only internet asset that you can actually own.

This isn't just about a personal website though. This is Linus Tech Tips (with a staff of about 20 people) building his own platform for delivering content as the article points out. That's a considerable development effort and probably out of reach for youtube creators who are large enough to make a living and depend on youtube, but not large enough to justify that kind of investment.

> That's a considerable development effort and probably out of reach for youtube creators who are large enough to make a living and depend on youtube, but not large enough to justify that kind of investment.

YouTube revolves around free content - this places creators on the platform at an immediate and significant disadvantage in terms of monetising their audience. Many YouTubers who are stuck in that rut of being dependent on YouTube, despite having a fairly large audience, would likely make a lot more money if they started producing content on platforms which offer better options for monetisation (ideally, their own).

A great example of this is Twitch. Direct monetisation of the audience is a fundamental part of the culture on Twitch. The site is optimised for it. Even before the Amazon Prime subscriptions, Twitch was FAR more profitable than YouTube for creators with audiences of comparable size.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#102

Because they are finally learning that all it takes to destroy their business is an algorithm glitch, or having 'wrong' political views, or just falling on the wrong side of an overzealous moderator. When you use someone else's platform you are completely dependent on the owner of the platform, and being dependent on something you don't control is a huge business risk.

What "wrong" political views are those?

This was controversial:

09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#103
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And how is that different on any other platform?

Youtube could easily just obliterate a channel today, for some video posted 10 years ago if they deem it bad enough. Doubt if you had your own platform you'd delete yourself for something cringe you said 10 years ago

Yes, but most people don't build their own server farms, don't have their own internet cable, so basically there is always some company in the middle that could easily cancel you.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#104
post #23

I can’t help but wonder why services like Vimeo don’t come up more often when getting off of YouTube? It seems like Vimeo offers similar functionality already. Is there something about it that I’m missing / is it just not cool for content creators?

I think the problem is that once you get to a certain volume of content it becomes eye wateringly expensive on Vimeo. Louis Rossmann explained this in a couple of his videos (I never bookmarked them). Even if he were to push just his repair videos (i.e. not including his opinion pieces) he'd fall into into a whole other universe of cost.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#105
post #80

Because they are finally learning that all it takes to destroy their business is an algorithm glitch, or having 'wrong' political views, or just falling on the wrong side of an overzealous moderator. When you use someone else's platform you are completely dependent on the owner of the platform, and being dependent on something you don't control is a huge business risk.

The same can be said for anyone working in the offline entertainment sector. People get blacklisted from Hollywood for upsetting powerful individuals (Weinstein destroyed a lot of careers this way, for a most recent example, before he was sent to prison.) Generally speaking, any industry where your revenue relies on marketing, promotion, or access to exclusive collaboration and distribution networks is going to have…

Yes, these platforms primarily exist to drain revenue from the long tail of unappreciated content. I don't think that's a positive thing.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Youtube could easily just obliterate a channel today, for some video posted 10 years ago if they deem it bad enough. Doubt if you had your own platform you'd delete yourself for something cringe you said 10 years ago

Yes, but most people don't build their own server farms, don't have their own internet cable, so basically there is always some company in the middle that could easily cancel you.

It's much harder if you have actual humans on the other side.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What "wrong" political views are those?

This was controversial: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

That's not the best example. Every attempt to shut it down just made it spread further.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#109
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you own a site that has systemic issues with child pornography sharing and other illegal material, you probably deserve it.

4chan is a shady place, but it is definitely not a bastion of child porn. The owners do not allow anything like that.

GP was probably referring to some part of 8chan, not 4chan.

Re: Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What "wrong" political views are those?

Whichever the platform operator disapproves of.

*at this time. Dr Seuss was totally OK just a few weeks ago.

Btw, is "OK" still OK??!

Post reply on HN