Live data from Hacker News

Donate Unrestricted

paulgraham.com

181–190 of 301 posts

Re: Donate Unrestricted

#181

Over the years my opinion of non-profits has become less, shall we say, “charitable”; society has a tendency to glorify non-profits because they “don’t have shareholders” but, in reality, a lot of non-profits give peanuts to those at the bottom (with some even working for free) while executives get far more than a living salary. And whether you’re an educational institution, an insurance provider, or an NGO, being an…

This is even worse than a restricted donation. The nonprofit will live in fear of a loan being called and they'll respond to that risk by spending lots of time appeasing the donor at the expense of using their time helping people, which is likely the opposite of what everyone wants.

On top of this, how could a nonprofit make commitments to people (often people in very vulnerable situations) knowing their funding might get called at any moment? If a donor wants this much control over a nonprofit, they should just start and fund one themselves.

In terms of nonprofits taking too large of salaries, I'd trust beneficiaries to decide what's appropriate. I often feel like some donors care more about low salaries than they care about how much the people being paid are helping others. I'd happily pay a CEO $1M to create $100M in impact over paying a CEO $100k to create $500k in impact, the latter being much more common imo.

Re: Donate Unrestricted

#182

Over the years my opinion of non-profits has become less, shall we say, “charitable”; society has a tendency to glorify non-profits because they “don’t have shareholders” but, in reality, a lot of non-profits give peanuts to those at the bottom (with some even working for free) while executives get far more than a living salary. And whether you’re an educational institution, an insurance provider, or an NGO, being an…

There's a huge fallacy where people believe that non-profits are supposed to be inherently more equitable and nicer than for-profit companies. And people who believe this fallacy get upset by executive pay at non-profits and turn to sites like Charity Navigator to find charities where 99 cents of their dollar goes to charity. But the fact of the matter is that paying salaries to people who bring in more money than th…

> can raise awareness exponentially

Is there anyone left that isn’t aware of breast cancer? What is more awareness spending getting anyone at this point (aside from non profit executives)?

Re: Donate Unrestricted

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If I wanted to donate a large amount of money to a non-profit, I would structure it as a zero-interest loan, and would just keep deferring the repayment of the loan as long as the org stays true to its mission This flies totally in the face of Paul's post. His point is to donate unrestricted to non-profits you _trust_. If you can't trust the organization or need to put controls in place to prevent them from doing s…

I don't think it's so black and white. The leaders at the organization could change and they certainly aren't going to give you your money back.

So plan to give $x/N per year for N years, and stop donating if you don’t get the results you want.

I don’t see a reason to make things complicated; every bit of overhead reduces the net impact your dollars are going to have.

Re: Donate Unrestricted

#184

I worked in Accounting (the dept that did it, not the one that taught it) IT at a major public university for several years. Something like half of the software complexity was in keeping track of each dollar's origin, and making sure that it was spent on only what the source approved it to be spent on. Whether the source was the federal government, the state, corporate donors, or wealthy individuals, they all had str…

These kind of problems might be a good soil for some blockchain based things to reach actual utility. It pains me to see how difficult giving can be (even if it's justified) and having a solution to make it leaner would be very much welcomed.

Re: Donate Unrestricted

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If I wanted to donate a large amount of money to a non-profit, I would structure it as a zero-interest loan, and would just keep deferring the repayment of the loan as long as the org stays true to its mission, compensates executives in reasonable proportion to regular employees, etc. Not sure if I'm missing something, but this sounds totally ridiculous to me. You give 1M to someone you think is going to spend it w…

No organization would accept a donation of this form. If the size of the donation was large enough to be compelling, it would also put the organization at risk. Having a looming loan of millions of dollars at risk if you upset someone isn't viable, especially given that the implication is that this would last indefinitely. A nonprofit that took loans like this over time would very quickly end up with potential debts…

Agreed, if a non-profit takes enough of these that any one loan (or any group of loans) makes up a majority of their assets/income, they've implicitly taken on a new board and are more beholden to the "money board" than to their actual board.

Re: Donate Unrestricted

#186
post #4

I've done a fair amount of volunteering for nonprofits, one in particular[1], and I will say that nonprofits are full of the most overworked, underpaid, and passionate people you will meet anywhere. They need every penny they can get, and very often people mistake nonprofits spending money on essential activities like marketing or event planning as "overhead", when such expenditures generate multiples of revenue for…

I volunteered for the last few months. One thing that surprised me just a bit is how motivated I could be even without any money benefits. Also that charity warehouse was better equipped than my previous gig at a truck disassembly plant at some very large truck renting company. In the former we had a whole fleet of powered pallet trolleys or fenwicks, the latter had 2 busted manual pallet jacks and 1 fenwick. Go figure.

Re: Donate Unrestricted

#187
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Now it is funding anti-racist math: https://equitablemath.org/ In my limited experience, a lot of students seem to have specific weaknesses with the subjects that are traditionally taught in middle school. Manipulating fractions, applying the distributive property consistently, and simply understanding how to dereference a variable by inserting an equivalent number or expression -- I have multiple students messing t…

https://equitablemath.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/11... I dug in a bit and found that and... as progressive as I would like to think I am, I'm 100% confused as to how "focus on getting the 'right' answer" and "independent practice is valued over teamwork" is... 'white supremacy' showing up in math. HN may not be the place to discuss this, but... am I missing something obvious?

Since seeing the original comment I have spent the last 2 or 3 hours reading about this. I started on the website and with that document and was confused myself. I also didn't notice the explainers later in the document (the links didn't work for me either).

I watched a webinar linked from the website which covered the material in the document, but the presenters didn't cover a 'what is and what isn't racist in the maths classroom' checklist, rather they showed how to use the document in your teaching/preparation. They did note at the beginning that a level of awareness about antiracism is required, and at the end linked to several sources regarding racism in the curriculum and racism in the math classroom (and beyond).

I had seen a meme recently about 'math is racist' and I didn't get the reference at the time, I'm guessing it's about this foundation. Everybody knows that math is not racist and nobody is claiming it is. The problem is that governments are racist, institutions are racist and classrooms can be racist.

There is a mind view that many people hold which automatically assigns people of colour a lower expectation of academic achievement. The government announces new educational reforms citing statistics that people of colour achieve less academically. These reforms pay for additional teaching time or 'interventions' which amount to a few to a dozen hours of extra teaching which is supposed to achieve something that the five year old was unable to learn in the 36000 hours they've lived so far and 'level the playing field'. Teacher evaluation bars people of colour entry to eighth grade math though they have the grades. Math questions as recent as this decade ask you how many plants of cotton can 400 slaves pick in 120 days or how many slaves can you fit in a slave ship with x and y dimensions.

There is nothing in the brain of people of any race (or gender - maths is sexist too!) that stops them from comprehending mathematics. So why do white boys do math more good? Then go on to earn the good STEM degrees and high-paying STEM jobs disproportionately?

Math focusing on the right answers in the classroom is discouraging for anybody who is already discouraged. Similarly, having a hard time understanding and being afraid not only to get something wrong, but to question the authority can be scary, especially when you are growing up in an environment where questioning some authorities can incite conflict.

As another comment suggested, it is generally good advice for any math teaching. The same goes for teamwork over individual work - being able to explore and approach the problem as a group, and work through it vocally with others as a collective can be encouraging and is also a good opportunity to learn from other perspectives. From the perspective of race, I would agree with the guide which mentions the problems of 'individualisation' in the classroom, how this can lead to competitiveness and further discouragement of those who are struggling.

Most of the principles in the guide seem like best practice to me for any group of young mathematicians. Especially those who do not feel like they can be mathematicians or have any place doing mathematics. Despite its diverse history, success in mathematics in popular culture is associated with white men. That is my view at least, and whether that view has been developed because of my own internal racism or because that is how mathematicians were depicted to me in TV and cinema I don't know.

I think there is a lot to unpack here, I am happy that some discourse on the subject has started here. I am looking forward to learning more about this topic and about myself and those around me and thank the original commenter for bringing it to my attention, though I think they realise themselves that racism in the classroom is a problem which NEEDS to be tackled.

I made a HN account for this so I am sorry if I have missed any commenting conventions. I am on mobile so do not have any citations but would be happy to provide them when I can.

Re: Donate Unrestricted

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think it's so black and white. The leaders at the organization could change and they certainly aren't going to give you your money back.

So plan to give $x/N per year for N years, and stop donating if you don’t get the results you want. I don’t see a reason to make things complicated; every bit of overhead reduces the net impact your dollars are going to have.

What if the complication keeps them moving in the direction you want? That may make your dollars have additional impact rather than less.

Re: Donate Unrestricted

#189

Over the years my opinion of non-profits has become less, shall we say, “charitable”; society has a tendency to glorify non-profits because they “don’t have shareholders” but, in reality, a lot of non-profits give peanuts to those at the bottom (with some even working for free) while executives get far more than a living salary. And whether you’re an educational institution, an insurance provider, or an NGO, being an…

Zero-interest deferrable loans are an amazing idea. I suppose you'd have to be a substantial investor in order to get the non-profit to accept such a deal.

Re: Donate Unrestricted

#190
post #176

Over the years my opinion of non-profits has become less, shall we say, “charitable”; society has a tendency to glorify non-profits because they “don’t have shareholders” but, in reality, a lot of non-profits give peanuts to those at the bottom (with some even working for free) while executives get far more than a living salary. And whether you’re an educational institution, an insurance provider, or an NGO, being an…

55 million USD just in salaries at Wikipedia per year, that's plenty of money to swim into :)

Yeah, and they keep asking for donations as if Wikipedia was in constant danger of being wiped out. Pretty screwed up.
Post reply on HN