It's strange to me how any censorship from Facebook is savaged on this site but I rarely see censorship on HackerNews criticized. This website habitually shadowbans people and controversial comments are hidden as if they never existed. The mods here explicitly warn people against rocking the boat, all in the name of "preserving what this site is for". The disparity is very odd to me. In many ways it seems like people…
A HN account doesn't have much value. Unless commenting on HN is what gives you joy in life, you won't be impacted much if you lose it. Major socials can be a big part of one's identity, the way one communicates with friends, work and businesses. The "value" of your account grows with usage. There's no chat on HN, no follower graphs or whatever. Pretty sure most HNers don't even notice usernames on here.
I do believe any business has the absolute right to censor anything they want. But in case of FB, Twitter etc too much censorship [0] compromises the value proposition. On HN it is the value proposition.
For the record, yes, I do think they're self sabotaging and will eventually pay the price. I'm guessing the demise will look much more like IBM rather than Myspace.
[0] For example, it makes perfect sense to ban people who actively harass others. Most users don't want to deal with too much nastiness, it reduces the value of your platform.