Live data from Hacker News

Apple now lets you transfer your iCloud Photos to Google Photos

support.apple.com

111–120 of 355 posts

Re: Apple now lets you transfer your iCloud Photos to Google Photos

#111
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, just a small fraction of countries, like the United States and the European Union. I'm sure nobody cares about those places.

Is there a good reason for the code implementing this to know anything at all about the fact that the world is divided into countries? I don't think there is.

Yet every code implementation exists in some country bound by laws.

Re: Apple now lets you transfer your iCloud Photos to Google Photos

#112
post #40

Unrelated, but this reminds me of a recent incident. A friend came over to me asking for help transferring his WhatsApp chats from his old iPhone to his new Android phone. Turns out there is no official/practical way to do that, and he lost all hos chat and media records made across years (WhatsApp is the main mode of communication here, it's like opening up your official mail inbox one day and finding it completely…

I also lost all my WhatsApp history and data when I added WhatsApp to a new phone. Weird that it can only be active on one device.

The issue is how the data is backed up on Android vs iOS. In theory, if your iCloud or Google account is the same between devices then transfer to a new, same-OS device is trivial. It should "just work" in most cases. But WhatsApp does not provide its own backup service (which is fine with me) nor does it allow you to specify where to back it up to (which is not fine with me). If it did, then users switching between iOS and Android would have no (or little) trouble.

Re: Apple now lets you transfer your iCloud Photos to Google Photos

#113
post #92
post #68

If any Google Photos product people are here... Since you're ending free unlimited photo storage, I badly want a feature that automatically finds all groupings of similar photos and deletes all but the best one (least blurry, most smiles, whatever you decide). Whenever I take photos, I tend to spam the shutter button, so I end up with 3+ photos of anything and everything. I could stay on Google Photos for many, many…

I'd second that, or alternatively just a plan that lets me upload unlimited photos for a monthly fee like Flickr used to do very early on.

This exists. It uses you general google storage quota (shared with gmail, gdrive, etc).

Re: Apple now lets you transfer your iCloud Photos to Google Photos

#114
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bundling a spreadsheet app with photo storage ought to be against some competition rule... Just like Amazon has taken over so many markets with Prime...

Disagree. As Steve job puts it: dropbox (and cloud storage in general) is "a feature and not a product".

While I agree it shouldn't be against some law or anything - we'd be kidding ourselves if we didn't assume this was a calculated move to edge people into Office365 vs. GSuite/LibreOffice + DropBox, etc...

1TB is huge, and nobody can compete with that "for free" right now. Although, as a heavy OneDrive user, I'll tell you it's not nearly as good of a product as DropBox or even Google Drive (in my limited experience with both).

The name of the OneDrive folder cannot be changed, it limits how large of a file you can sync into it, routinely gets "stuck" syncing forever (requiring a hard reset of OneDrive), has rate limited downloads, etc. It's clearly an afterthought for Microsoft - probably because they give it away for free.

Re: Apple now lets you transfer your iCloud Photos to Google Photos

#115
post #5

A bit sad that Google Photos will start charging you for storage soon, but it's still miles better than iCloud Photos in almost everything. From search, to timeline overview, to seamless integration with my Chromecast, to automatic face tagging, to editing.

Anecdotal annoyance with automatic face tagging: Old dog and new dog look very similar. Google keeps tagging my new dog as if he were my old dog and I haven't found a way to fix that without manually going through every single picture and untagging/retagging.

On the web site, go to "explore" and pick the face of either dog, it should offer a little button that says "Same or different?" that will give you an opportunity to train it.

Re: Apple now lets you transfer your iCloud Photos to Google Photos

#117
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd second that, or alternatively just a plan that lets me upload unlimited photos for a monthly fee like Flickr used to do very early on.

This exists. It uses you general google storage quota (shared with gmail, gdrive, etc).

This is different, though: Flickr used to charge for the capability to upload, Google charges for keeping the photos available.

Re: Apple now lets you transfer your iCloud Photos to Google Photos

#118
post #68

If any Google Photos product people are here... Since you're ending free unlimited photo storage, I badly want a feature that automatically finds all groupings of similar photos and deletes all but the best one (least blurry, most smiles, whatever you decide). Whenever I take photos, I tend to spam the shutter button, so I end up with 3+ photos of anything and everything. I could stay on Google Photos for many, many…

...and if any are here let me add:

Can we please please get a return of the Assistant-style creations? All that exists now is the Instagram Stories-style auto-playing albums. Does anyone actually like these better?

Re: Apple now lets you transfer your iCloud Photos to Google Photos

#119

For those of you wanting a way to get your photos out of Google, I recommend https://takeout.google.com I used it last week to migrate my Google photos to Nextcloud, it was pretty painless.

Nextcloud now has an app to migrate your Google data (files, photos, calendars and contacts) straight away.

Re: Apple now lets you transfer your iCloud Photos to Google Photos

#120
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This exists. It uses you general google storage quota (shared with gmail, gdrive, etc).

This is different, though: Flickr used to charge for the capability to upload, Google charges for keeping the photos available.

Ah I see. To be honest I feel like paying for storage capacity is a much more reasonable pricing model.
Post reply on HN