Live data from Hacker News

Lotus 1-2-3 arbitrary resolution

lock.cmpxchg8b.com

111–120 of 130 posts

Re: Lotus 1-2-3 arbitrary resolution

#111
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Globally it has a variety of often charming interpretations: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At_sign#Names_in_other_languag...

> snabel-a, the Swedish/Danish name (which means 'trunk A', as in 'elephant's trunk') This one is my favorite but I am biased because I grew up to this name. Always found it a funny name though.

[deleted]

Re: Lotus 1-2-3 arbitrary resolution

#112
post #89
post #82

I think there is something kind of fun about purposefully using "outdated" software, and even valuable sometimes, in the same way that it's useful to use a dead language like Latin nowadays; it's not changing so there's sort of a bit of "equality" to it, for want of a better word. For example, I've actually thought it might make sense for people to release new software on DOS or the Sega Genesis, simply because they'…

> can run on pretty much any modern platform under the sun Which is why web apps shine. Near-universal reach.

this is about their only redeeming quality to me, ease of maintenance and compatibility. From a design standpoint with all the mix of too many technologies on shabby scaffolding it is annoying. But you know what they say "it works". I have some high hopes for web assembly to reduce some of this. or at least hide it.

Re: Lotus 1-2-3 arbitrary resolution

#113
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wordperfect at least existed for Unix platforms so might be somewhat portable to linux. I don't remember Lotus or Microsoft ever being on Unix back in the day. Though Lotus did have Improv on the NeXT so maybe they did...

WordGrinder is probably the only thing I can think of that’s open source and in the same spirit.

And Wordtsar, but it needs X.

Re: Lotus 1-2-3 arbitrary resolution

#114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is waaaay off topic, but you've piqued my interest -- what on earth are you still testing with IE3 for?

Don't use any site he made... Anything compatible with IE3 is incompatible with modern privacy expectations (doesn't support any vaguely secure variant of HTTPS, and any server which supports old variants can't be protected against downgrade attacks, and therefore cannot protect users privacy)

i use plain http... just like the homepage in your profile.

Re: Lotus 1-2-3 arbitrary resolution

#115
post #51

Amazing story. Can't believe the Lotus FTP site is still live. Wonder where that thing is running and if anyone actually knows it still is. > I was able to find the drivers on an old ftp site. Wonder what FTP site this is and how he found it?

"Can't believe the Lotus FTP site is still live. Wonder where that thing is running" Had me curious as well. $ host ftp.support.lotus.com ftp.support.lotus.com is an alias for service.boulder.ibm.com. service.boulder.ibm.com has address 170.225.15.26 It's running WUFTPD 2.6.3, which is abandonware as far as I can tell. Though no open vulnerabilities listed.

They probably have this running in a well walled off VM so it doesn't really matter to them for the most part I would guess . A customer will report it if files get corrupted or something looks fishy I suppose.

Re: Lotus 1-2-3 arbitrary resolution

#116
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nobody at IBM will ever want to be the person to suggest decommissioning a server that might make a paying customer yell at their manager. Expect it to continue forever.

Back in mid-2019, IBM took down their old IBM Library Server mainframe documentation website – http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/library – it was absolutely fascinating, it had documentation on mainframe products going back to the 1990s, and even other random stuff like a bunch of obscure IBM software packages for OS/2. Their new mainframe documentation site only has recent releases on it, it is mi…

Why would they bother lowering how much content is there? I don't understand people. It's completely orthogonal whether it's on sftp or ftp or https

Re: Lotus 1-2-3 arbitrary resolution

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is waaaay off topic, but you've piqued my interest -- what on earth are you still testing with IE3 for?

Don't use any site he made... Anything compatible with IE3 is incompatible with modern privacy expectations (doesn't support any vaguely secure variant of HTTPS, and any server which supports old variants can't be protected against downgrade attacks, and therefore cannot protect users privacy)

Uh it all depends on context like most things.

Re: Lotus 1-2-3 arbitrary resolution

#118
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Back in mid-2019, IBM took down their old IBM Library Server mainframe documentation website – http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/library – it was absolutely fascinating, it had documentation on mainframe products going back to the 1990s, and even other random stuff like a bunch of obscure IBM software packages for OS/2. Their new mainframe documentation site only has recent releases on it, it is mi…

So basically we need to archive the Lotus FTP site now , before they pull an Intel

It's already archived here! https://archive.org/details/2012_11_24_ftp_lotus_com

Re: Lotus 1-2-3 arbitrary resolution

#119
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nobody at IBM will ever want to be the person to suggest decommissioning a server that might make a paying customer yell at their manager. Expect it to continue forever.

Back in mid-2019, IBM took down their old IBM Library Server mainframe documentation website – http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/library – it was absolutely fascinating, it had documentation on mainframe products going back to the 1990s, and even other random stuff like a bunch of obscure IBM software packages for OS/2. Their new mainframe documentation site only has recent releases on it, it is mi…

> it had documentation on mainframe products going back to the 1990s

Holy crap! That's so old that it's when I was programming (in assembler) on a 3090! (First programming job. Early to mid-90s. Moved to *nix. Never looked back)

:)

Re: Lotus 1-2-3 arbitrary resolution

#120
post #86
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had one of these in college! I hooked it up to a serial port and set up Linux to use it as a login terminal, so I could do email in Pine while my girlfriend worked on homework with the actual keyboard/mouse/monitor. It didn’t just have Lotus; it had a dedicated Lotus key.

Lotus 1-2-3 was the killer application. It was the reason for many people for buying a computer.

A PC was not fully IBM compatible unless it could run Lotus 1-2-3.
Post reply on HN