Live data from Hacker News

The future lifespan of Earth’s oxygenated atmosphere

nature.com

1–10 of 90 posts

Re: The future lifespan of Earth’s oxygenated atmosphere

#6

Patently ridiculous to make the assumption that given a billion years, no multicellular photosynthesizing organisms will adapt to the changing environment. A billion years.

Oxygen is a best in class reagent. Lots of pent up energy. You're correct that it's not necessary, but it's going to be tough without it.

Re: The future lifespan of Earth’s oxygenated atmosphere

#7
I can't see the paper [1].

But the code is here: https://github.com/kazumi-ozaki/lifespan/blob/master/main.f9...

It does not give me great confidence in the modeling. Perhaps the paper goes into great detail about the formulas used in the code, and explains those variables and naming choices (those not in the Constants file with comments), or the fitting coefficients.

Of course, I really wonder how the complexity of the natural world could be captured by a few hundred variables.

1. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-021-00693-5#data-avai...

Re: The future lifespan of Earth’s oxygenated atmosphere

#9
My impression is that a large amount of what we think as non-biological is in fact the product of life. Making the prediction that life will be unable keep the environment the same despite external factors seems like a bold predication; let's see how it plays out.
Post reply on HN