I’m not sure, but this might be related to my issues whenever I used chrome, and it would auto fill hidden elements of settings forms in pfSense. All of a sudden you had changed stuff you didn’t mean to, or get seemingly weird errors about invalid input. At least I could imagine this prop being applied to hidden elements, either in pfSense or internally in chrome.
Chrome does not respect autocomplete=off (2018)
31–40 of 84 posts
Re: Chrome does not respect autocomplete=off (2018)
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’ve seen autocomplete create plenty of problems. It can break some (admittedly poorly designed) forms outright. Or in others simply create a bad user experience. There are lots of forms that ask for an address but that should never be autocompleted to the user’s address. In practice as a developer you have to resort to JavaScript hacks and obfuscating form field names to avoid it.
I really really wish there was a way (holding shift, ctrl or something) to only autofill the one field without it goig to fill/replace every other field on the page. It's so annoying when the stuff you just field get replaced just because you want to autofill one field.
Re: Chrome does not respect autocomplete=off (2018)
#33It is ironic that so many developers are taking the time to complain on the bug tracker but won't simply write Chrome out of their org. I did that at a place and most of the users didn't even realize something had changed. No developers seem to have a problem simply refusing to support Firefox. I wonder how much extra effort it is going to take for them to finally make the switch.
Maybe you haven't checked this since 2013: https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share This statistic is not without reason. Chrome still has considerable usability and security advantages, especially for non-technical people(at least on anything that's not OS X), and still the best dev tools out there. We can be lucky that FF at least tries to stick to standards where Safari doesn't bother.
As long as the corporate/enterprise apps work on Firefox (which they should?), it's not a problem for a corporate IT department to ban Chrome.
Re: Chrome does not respect autocomplete=off (2018)
#34wat. Developer gag left unchecked?
Re: Chrome does not respect autocomplete=off (2018)
#35Thanks, Chrome. So many sites have user-hostile code that is overridden by this choice. I still remember the glee when I first started using Chrome all those years ago, and suddenly all those forms filled themselves out.
The PCI-DSS council is partly to blame here, for recommending autocomplete=off in other contexts.
Re: Chrome does not respect autocomplete=off (2018)
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’ve seen autocomplete create plenty of problems. It can break some (admittedly poorly designed) forms outright. Or in others simply create a bad user experience. There are lots of forms that ask for an address but that should never be autocompleted to the user’s address. In practice as a developer you have to resort to JavaScript hacks and obfuscating form field names to avoid it.
I really really wish there was a way (holding shift, ctrl or something) to only autofill the one field without it goig to fill/replace every other field on the page. It's so annoying when the stuff you just field get replaced just because you want to autofill one field.
I figure most people just tolerate wrong inputs and live with the results. (It doesn't happen that often.)
Re: Chrome does not respect autocomplete=off (2018)
#37nor should it. privacy settings should be up to user not the site.
Unfortunately, in reality, it's probably more often used to force users to type things in for misguided "security reasons".
I think browser UI for this is generally just bad. I think forms should never auto-fill, but when I click on a form field, it should give me a dropdown to select text to put in just that field. Not that field plus all other fields in the form. Just that field. Then you don't have privacy issues (because the site never sees the autocomplete options unless the user actively selects one), and autocomplete="off" becomes unnecessary.
Re: Chrome does not respect autocomplete=off (2018)
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe you haven't checked this since 2013: https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share This statistic is not without reason. Chrome still has considerable usability and security advantages, especially for non-technical people(at least on anything that's not OS X), and still the best dev tools out there. We can be lucky that FF at least tries to stick to standards where Safari doesn't bother.
I don't think that's material. If we're talking about corporate policy on corporate-owned machines, employees shouldn't be complaining to IT that their favorite websites aren't working properly in Firefox. If they do, the canned IT response should always be "why are you doing personal tasks on your work machine?" As long as the corporate/enterprise apps work on Firefox (which they should?), it's not a problem for a c…
They have even less of a reason to support Firefox. I used to work on an partially enterprise (well, government) program. We dropped Firefox support for it because it was easier to tell the client to just install Chrome. And the complexity of enterprise software means that that will always be easier for the client as well than switching.
Re: Chrome does not respect autocomplete=off (2018)
#39Re: Chrome does not respect autocomplete=off (2018)
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe you haven't checked this since 2013: https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share This statistic is not without reason. Chrome still has considerable usability and security advantages, especially for non-technical people(at least on anything that's not OS X), and still the best dev tools out there. We can be lucky that FF at least tries to stick to standards where Safari doesn't bother.
I don't think that's material. If we're talking about corporate policy on corporate-owned machines, employees shouldn't be complaining to IT that their favorite websites aren't working properly in Firefox. If they do, the canned IT response should always be "why are you doing personal tasks on your work machine?" As long as the corporate/enterprise apps work on Firefox (which they should?), it's not a problem for a c…
I don't think any IT department worth their while would ban worthwhile software because of some agenda that frankly just doesn't matter too much to most regular users, at least in an US context.
In the EU this might be a bit different, as they would have an interest in getting Google out of their ecosystems - but we've seen that that just doesn't really work too well, with pilots in various governments. People aren't as productive and complain about not having the same Excel and the same Internet as they have at home.