the 3kbps example here with the 'bread with chocolate filling inside' video is frankly amazing, how good it is compared to the original. https://ai.googleblog.com/2021/02/lyra-new-very-low-bitrate-... It is unfortunate that for now this appears to be proprietary, closed source and being treated as a google competitive advantage over others, unlike opus which is fully open.
Lyra audio codec enables high-quality voice calls at 3 kbps bitrate
41–50 of 207 posts
Re: Lyra audio codec enables high-quality voice calls at 3 kbps bitrate
#42Nothing about licensing or patents. I assume the worst (read: unusable for small businesses)? 10+ years ago I worked in a small voip shop, where we had very high quality (low jitter), but low bandwidth connection. I researched many codecs of the time (2010-ish). We liked speex, because it can be used "without strings attached". Also, I can choose the quality depending on the bandwidth. Although for low bandwidth g729…
It is sad that we have to think about licensing and patents of technologies instead of only how good or advanced they are.
Re: Lyra audio codec enables high-quality voice calls at 3 kbps bitrate
#43Re: Lyra audio codec enables high-quality voice calls at 3 kbps bitrate
#44Nothing about licensing or patents. I assume the worst (read: unusable for small businesses)? 10+ years ago I worked in a small voip shop, where we had very high quality (low jitter), but low bandwidth connection. I researched many codecs of the time (2010-ish). We liked speex, because it can be used "without strings attached". Also, I can choose the quality depending on the bandwidth. Although for low bandwidth g729…
If there's a free software implementation, and a company offering the service based in the EU (or shop around and find any other jurisdiction where software patents don't matter), it's often YOLO - but call that "legal arbitrage" if you want to sound fancy :)
Re: Lyra audio codec enables high-quality voice calls at 3 kbps bitrate
#45What I want to know is whether Lyra takes any longer to encode than the alternatives. Because as far as I can tell, nobody cares in the slightest about latency. Phone calls are getting to be like writing postcards to each other. Speak in a whole paragraph. Wait several seconds for the latency to clear. Then the other party responds with a whole paragraph, waits several seconds for the latency to clear... Improvements…
It was fantastic.
You don't appreciate how much latency is destroying our ability to communicate verbally until you go back to the old way.
One example is arguing. It's no wonder people used to be able to argue with one another on a telephone. You could raise your voice and still hear the other side and adjust your speech in real time. Today it's just one party shouting over the other to drown the opponent out.
Re: Lyra audio codec enables high-quality voice calls at 3 kbps bitrate
#46What I want to know is whether Lyra takes any longer to encode than the alternatives. Because as far as I can tell, nobody cares in the slightest about latency. Phone calls are getting to be like writing postcards to each other. Speak in a whole paragraph. Wait several seconds for the latency to clear. Then the other party responds with a whole paragraph, waits several seconds for the latency to clear... Improvements…
Re: Lyra audio codec enables high-quality voice calls at 3 kbps bitrate
#47If the demos are actually representative, it does seem impressive. Could save a lot of bandwidth for VoiP if it replaced 8kb/s G729.
Isn‘t VoIP at such low data rates already dominated by the overhead of UDP, IP and whatever lower layer? Multiplexing it with a low-bandwidth video stream would be possible, though. I was thinking this could be most relevant for something like digital wireless transmissions.
Re: Lyra audio codec enables high-quality voice calls at 3 kbps bitrate
#48Nothing about licensing or patents. I assume the worst (read: unusable for small businesses)? 10+ years ago I worked in a small voip shop, where we had very high quality (low jitter), but low bandwidth connection. I researched many codecs of the time (2010-ish). We liked speex, because it can be used "without strings attached". Also, I can choose the quality depending on the bandwidth. Although for low bandwidth g729…
These days it's more or less the standard for realtime voice. WebRTC uses it, most of the popular realtime voice applications use it as well, as does Signal.
Re: Lyra audio codec enables high-quality voice calls at 3 kbps bitrate
#49What I want to know is whether Lyra takes any longer to encode than the alternatives. Because as far as I can tell, nobody cares in the slightest about latency. Phone calls are getting to be like writing postcards to each other. Speak in a whole paragraph. Wait several seconds for the latency to clear. Then the other party responds with a whole paragraph, waits several seconds for the latency to clear... Improvements…
Just disable VoIP or disconnect from WiFi.