Live data from Hacker News

In Defense of Dumb TVs

frame.work

301–310 of 391 posts

Re: In Defense of Dumb TVs

#301
post #296

I fully agree about dumb TVs for personal use. Even having to wait for your TV's OS to boot up when you turn it on is a terrible UX. However, when it comes to buying a TV for your conference room where you have a TV running 12hrs/day (when you're not a small startup with 10ppl), invest in a proper commercial TV like NEC or (my personal favorite brand) iiyama: 1) the're dumb TVs from the start, 2) you get proper warra…

The problem is not the mere boot time of your SmartTV. You are waiting for the SmartTV to send your viewing profile home. That's a lot of data. Before that the UI stays frozen. In earlier SmartTV OS versions it was immediate startup, the delay only started some years ago. Never upgrade your OS. Maybe they are even sending home recorded audio of what you did in your bedroom, that long it lasts.

Citation needed. There's no evidence that any TV sends this data at boot (and frankly there's no need to, it can send this data later on).

Re: In Defense of Dumb TVs

#302
post #296

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem is not the mere boot time of your SmartTV. You are waiting for the SmartTV to send your viewing profile home. That's a lot of data. Before that the UI stays frozen. In earlier SmartTV OS versions it was immediate startup, the delay only started some years ago. Never upgrade your OS. Maybe they are even sending home recorded audio of what you did in your bedroom, that long it lasts.

Citation needed. There's no evidence that any TV sends this data at boot (and frankly there's no need to, it can send this data later on).

It's also not a lot of data, of course. "Viewing data" is under a megabyte.

Re: In Defense of Dumb TVs

#305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes - I wish Apple would just make a TV. Call it a living room screen or a living room monitor or something. Make it OLED, dumb TV, instant on, Apple TV box plugs in. Separate box with front facing ports that connects to screen with one cable. A remote designed by someone who thought about it for ten seconds (why do modern TVs have dozens of buttons no one ever uses?). This entire market is in desperate need of someo…

Google is adding a “dumb TV mode,” but I’m skeptical. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/02/the-best-feature-of-... Presumably will still boot slowly and only the topmost UI layer loads differently, and until they confirm otherwise I’m guessing that even with a simplified UI it still includes all the creepy tracking of everything you watch.

How will they track you though, some sort of real time content id of everything you watch? Is there any evidence that they do this? If it’s in dumb tv mode and the display stream is coming from a separate device like an Apple TV then it seems much less trivial to track you than if you’re using the builtin smart features.

Re: In Defense of Dumb TVs

#306

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The best for who? This is a ridiculous take, nobody wants to roll their own TV UX except HN users looking for a weekend project. What usability / long-term reliability perk does your own software running on a RPI have over an Apple TV plugged into a dumb TV / monitor?

Or just buy a smart TV and just never connect it to the internet.

That doesn't stop it from spending a minute trying at every boot, or from using a cellular whispernet.

Re: In Defense of Dumb TVs

#307
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The best option that I know of today (in terms of resulting usabilty and long term reliability) is using a dumb computer monitor and roll the rest yourself with a Raspi. While this option is certainly not available to all, it is the only thing that will really fit your needs. I completely gave up on finding anything decent in that market.

Are the graphics on a Raspi really that good?

Full-screen Streaming is much less compute intensive than rendering and compositing.

Re: In Defense of Dumb TVs

#308

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Physical remote > any app. By far. Die apps, die. I want dedicated remotes for lights, stereo, curtains, garage door, and TV. Apps won’t be around – forget 20 years, 5 years if you’re lucky. A company can disappear along with its stupid fucking app. About the only advantage an app has is a keyboard.

Hi systemvoltage! We heard you like remotes, so how about a remote with dedicated, non-reprogrammable buttons to open apps you never use that don't even exist anymore? Sincerely, Roku

How about arrow keys and an ok button?

Re: In Defense of Dumb TVs

#309
post #220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OLEDs are much cheaper than that. Or do you mean an Apple markup?

Look at recent trends in the price of the mac pro, or how much their headphones cost. Heck, the stand for the mac pro monitor is $999.

A tv is not a Mac Pro.

Look at the price of Mac mini.

Re: In Defense of Dumb TVs

#310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure. Assuming your voice assistant works first time. Otherwise the dialog would go a little more like this: Me OK Google mute Me> OK...Google....mute Me> OKGOOGLE mute G> Sorry, I don't understand Me> mute... Me> MUTE MUTE MUTE MUTE MUTE Me> OKGOOGLE MUTE G> What would you like to mute? Me> The TV Me> Mute the fucking TV Google Me> OKGOOGLE MUTE THE FUCKING TV G> Sorry, I don't understand Me> Fuck it. I should have…

I got into a very similar conversation with Chase's robo call the other day. Went like this: C: bla bla bla, if you want to speak to a representative say "representative". Me: representative C: sorry i couldn't understand, please chose an option or say representative to speak with one Me: re-pre-sen-ta-tive C: (same answer as before) Me: REPRESENTATIVE C: (same answer as before) Me: GO FUCK YOURSELF C: Ok, I'll call…

The standard polite way to request an agent is: "operator operator fuck fuck fuck"
Post reply on HN