Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not to be unkind but I suppose most people are not really traumatised by merely seeing someone's name, even if they're not on speaking terms with that person. It probably falls on the side of convenience for the vast majority. For the Signal org, it's possibly even an existential issue, since it helps them counter network effects in the incumbents. It's hard to expect them not to do it, then. Having said that, I thin…
> but I suppose most people are not really traumatised by merely seeing someone's name I mean there are cases where that can be devastating . "Ohai here's your old abusive ex, here's a chat box just for good measure, good luck!". There are people who I'd never ever want to be within a textbox and tap away from accessing me, for any reason, period. You can get restraining orders in the physical world, the digital worl…
(a) You can't take seeing their name, but you keep them in your contacts? Don't you occasionally scroll past it with a call button right there, which is just as easy to hit and put you in touch with them? How is this any different? Seems a bit silly.
(b) As far as I know, research suggests hyper-avoidance is not a good way to resolve trauma. So I'm not convinced by the idea that this is harmful, especially when you can control it through (a).