Live data from Hacker News

DigitalOcean S-1

sec.gov

21–30 of 442 posts

Re: DigitalOcean S-1

#21

So how does one buy ipo shares? One of my resolutions for this year was to buy shares in companies I do business with.

They allocate chunks to the big brokerages and you can apply for a piece. Think you need to meet sophisticated investor criteria tho

Re: DigitalOcean S-1

#22

What is the point of DigitalOcean, Linode etc, when one can use the more reliable big cloud providers GCP/AWS/Azure. I don't think DO's offerings are strong enough to compete with the big players long term, especially in production. Seems like an exit for a later acquisition by a bigger company, like Slack with Salesforce.

for some of us, it's a desire to not give Google, Amazon, or Microsoft any money.

The big clouds offer great features, but My 5/mo Linode is fine to run a 3 user matrix server.

(I used to work at Linode, but that didn't sway my desire to avoid the big 3.)

Re: DigitalOcean S-1

#23
post #6

What is the point of DigitalOcean, Linode etc, when one can use the more reliable big cloud providers GCP/AWS/Azure. I don't think DO's offerings are strong enough to compete with the big players long term, especially in production. Seems like an exit for a later acquisition by a bigger company, like Slack with Salesforce.

It seems to me that these services are much more cost effective than AWS.

I'd argue that the billing is much more straightforward.

For example, you just pay $5 for a monthly droplet. AWS offers a near competitor to this,AWS light sail.

Digitalocean is easier to use, but only marginally. I strongly suspect many users who find AWS to be a confusing mess try DO instead. I used DO for a long time , but I've since switched to AWS

Re: DigitalOcean S-1

#24

What is the point of DigitalOcean, Linode etc, when one can use the more reliable big cloud providers GCP/AWS/Azure. I don't think DO's offerings are strong enough to compete with the big players long term, especially in production. Seems like an exit for a later acquisition by a bigger company, like Slack with Salesforce.

What's not strong about them? Not everybody needs or wants AWS's 1000+ service offerings. Managed k8s and databases are all most people want.

Re: DigitalOcean S-1

#25
There's already a lot of positive comments in here but I'll throw in another one. Tried DO out recently and I like how it set up.

I feel like the biggest competition is specific, tailored services from the bigger players - Amazon Lightsail for example.

Re: DigitalOcean S-1

#26
post #12

What is the point of DigitalOcean, Linode etc, when one can use the more reliable big cloud providers GCP/AWS/Azure. I don't think DO's offerings are strong enough to compete with the big players long term, especially in production. Seems like an exit for a later acquisition by a bigger company, like Slack with Salesforce.

Simpler and less complex?

They currently have an incident with their droplets right now at the time of writing, hardly reliable.

Re: DigitalOcean S-1

#27

What is the point of DigitalOcean, Linode etc, when one can use the more reliable big cloud providers GCP/AWS/Azure. I don't think DO's offerings are strong enough to compete with the big players long term, especially in production. Seems like an exit for a later acquisition by a bigger company, like Slack with Salesforce.

The company I work for solely uses DO. It has all the things you might want that won't get you cloud vendor locked. Plus their UI is actually useable, unlike my experience with AWS.

Many SV startups just end up taking their VC investment and handing it to AWS over a period of 18 months.

Re: DigitalOcean S-1

#28

What is the point of DigitalOcean, Linode etc, when one can use the more reliable big cloud providers GCP/AWS/Azure. I don't think DO's offerings are strong enough to compete with the big players long term, especially in production. Seems like an exit for a later acquisition by a bigger company, like Slack with Salesforce.

I think it mostly comes down to price (at least for me). They will always have to be cheaper than big cloud providers to stay competitive.

Re: DigitalOcean S-1

#30

What is the point of DigitalOcean, Linode etc, when one can use the more reliable big cloud providers GCP/AWS/Azure. I don't think DO's offerings are strong enough to compete with the big players long term, especially in production. Seems like an exit for a later acquisition by a bigger company, like Slack with Salesforce.

While I wouldn’t use DO et. al. for my production environment (it’s on AWS), I’ve got a handful of ancillary services that don’t need the complexity of AWS.

They’re so small and inconsequential to the business that I don’t want to spend any time thinking about the security risk of keeping them anywhere near production. They don’t need access to prod data so why put them in a position where they could potentially allow access to it?

So, for me, the easiest thing was to be put them with a completely different company. Don’t have to worry about any potential issues with imitating it on AWS (via additional accounts, different region, etc) which are all prone to human failure over time.

Maybe I’ve a bad reason, but it works for me and DO gets ~$50/mo from us and I’ve never considered switching.

Post reply on HN