Live data from Hacker News

Io language

iolanguage.com

11–20 of 36 posts

Re: Io language

#11
post #9

Io is not very fast, even slower than Ruby.

I wonder why this is downvoted.

Io is beautiful, elegant and slow. The fact that it's slow doesn't mean it's not worth learning or even using in production. Commenter could have put it in other words, well he didn't, but downvoters: you will not change the fact that it's slow by giving -1.

Do we have an era of wishful-thinking driven comment voting?

Re: Io language

#13
post #11
post #9

Io is not very fast, even slower than Ruby.

I wonder why this is downvoted. Io is beautiful, elegant and slow. The fact that it's slow doesn't mean it's not worth learning or even using in production. Commenter could have put it in other words, well he didn't, but downvoters: you will not change the fact that it's slow by giving -1. Do we have an era of wishful-thinking driven comment voting?

(note: I didn't down vote it.) Io the current implementation is slow but as Ruby, Javascript, and python have shown one slow implementation doesn't make a language slow. From what I understand Io developed by one person in his spare time so enough interest from the community could fix any performance problems.

Re: Io language

#14
post #11
post #9

Io is not very fast, even slower than Ruby.

I wonder why this is downvoted. Io is beautiful, elegant and slow. The fact that it's slow doesn't mean it's not worth learning or even using in production. Commenter could have put it in other words, well he didn't, but downvoters: you will not change the fact that it's slow by giving -1. Do we have an era of wishful-thinking driven comment voting?

Depending on what you want to do, Io can be really fast. It has SIMD support built in so for some structures it can be faster than unoptimized C.

Re: Io language

#17
post #14
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder why this is downvoted. Io is beautiful, elegant and slow. The fact that it's slow doesn't mean it's not worth learning or even using in production. Commenter could have put it in other words, well he didn't, but downvoters: you will not change the fact that it's slow by giving -1. Do we have an era of wishful-thinking driven comment voting?

Depending on what you want to do, Io can be really fast. It has SIMD support built in so for some structures it can be faster than unoptimized C.

That's what I didn't know, relying on my previous encounters and specific tests. Thank you for pointing this!

Re: Io language

#18
post #7
post #5

I cannot get over how beautiful that site design is.

Yes I also find it very aesthetically pleasing. And it's also very functional as well. For eg, see the search on the Reference page: http://www.iolanguage.com/scm/io/docs/reference/index.html Steve Dekorte, the creator of Io, also uses same site design on his on website/blog: http://dekorte.com/

Not to mention the tutorial, which is a work of art: succint, clear, informative and easy to follow (for a programmer anyway).

http://www.iolanguage.com/scm/io/docs/IoTutorial.html

Re: Io language

#19
post #17
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Depending on what you want to do, Io can be really fast. It has SIMD support built in so for some structures it can be faster than unoptimized C.

That's what I didn't know, relying on my previous encounters and specific tests. Thank you for pointing this!

And here is a blog post which shows that a 200 times increase in speed is possible when using SIMD: http://www.iolanguage.com/blog/blog.cgi?do=item&id=92

Re: Io language

#20

Definitely not interested in another dynamically typed language, no matter how elegant.

Io is worth learning just to see what a clean prototype-based language feels like. It'll probably improve your understanding of Javascript.
Post reply on HN