Live data from Hacker News

I heat my home by mining crypto currencies

blog.haschek.at

41–50 of 419 posts

Re: I heat my home by mining crypto currencies

#41
post #10

I wonder if we could make it even better and make smart heaters that instead of wasting calculations actually do something useful, something like folding proteins or some other computing load that doesn't require huge network load and can be easily distributed (something like SETI@home but actually useful). In densely populated cities we could bury huge datacenters underground and use that energy for heating directly…

Cryptocurrency mining doesn't actually require huge network load

Re: I heat my home by mining crypto currencies

#42
post #17
post #11

Future humans will wonder why humanity wasted so much valuable time, effort and real for no reason.

Bitcoin mining is still wastes half of the electricity of dormant (plugged in but unused) electrical devices in the US -- it's bad but we do other things that are worse

One of these is a minuscule amount of waste over an entire population which is very hard to reduce. The other is a very small group using a very large amount of power for very little gain which would be easy to stop.

Regardless, the solution to all is pretty simple, a carbon tax. If bitcoin miners want to build their own solar farm, let them.

Re: I heat my home by mining crypto currencies

#43
post #10

I wonder if we could make it even better and make smart heaters that instead of wasting calculations actually do something useful, something like folding proteins or some other computing load that doesn't require huge network load and can be easily distributed (something like SETI@home but actually useful). In densely populated cities we could bury huge datacenters underground and use that energy for heating directly…

I understand your point but it does gloss over the fact that the calculations are useful to the bitcoin network in terms of security.

In other words, when the last Bitcoin is mined, Bitcoin is well and truly fucked.

Bitcoin and other non-inflationary proof-of-work coins need to switch to proof-of-stake if they want any hope of longevity.

Re: I heat my home by mining crypto currencies

#44
post #10

I wonder if we could make it even better and make smart heaters that instead of wasting calculations actually do something useful, something like folding proteins or some other computing load that doesn't require huge network load and can be easily distributed (something like SETI@home but actually useful). In densely populated cities we could bury huge datacenters underground and use that energy for heating directly…

Produce electricity? I assume electricity was used to do the computation in the first place, turning into let's say 80% work and 20% heat. The idea was to use that 20% to heat our homes. The original electricity still needs to come from elsewhere.

Doing computations hardly stores any energy anywhere (the energy stored in, say, magnetization in a magnetic disk is pretty much negligible), so almost 100% of electricity is turned into heat.

The problem with this ~100% efficiency is that, if your goal is heating, you can move way more than 100% heat with 100% electrical energy if you use, say, a heat pump.

Re: I heat my home by mining crypto currencies

#45

A more environmentally friendly solution is to get a heat pump.

He is using a heat pump, he is using the excess heat of the miners to pre-warm air used by the heat pump to heat his house. The miners offset some of the cost of the heat pump and pay for their own electricity use.

I'm pretty sure it would be more efficient to directly heat the air inside than the heat pump input, though. At most they can transfer exactly the added energy.

Re: I heat my home by mining crypto currencies

#46
post #41
post #10

I wonder if we could make it even better and make smart heaters that instead of wasting calculations actually do something useful, something like folding proteins or some other computing load that doesn't require huge network load and can be easily distributed (something like SETI@home but actually useful). In densely populated cities we could bury huge datacenters underground and use that energy for heating directly…

Cryptocurrency mining doesn't actually require huge network load

I would call ~80 TWhpa "huge": https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption/

Re: I heat my home by mining crypto currencies

#47
post #10

I wonder if we could make it even better and make smart heaters that instead of wasting calculations actually do something useful, something like folding proteins or some other computing load that doesn't require huge network load and can be easily distributed (something like SETI@home but actually useful). In densely populated cities we could bury huge datacenters underground and use that energy for heating directly…

It is not wasted. This is the most common misunderstanding on this forum.

Miners are required to provable expend effort in order to become eligible to produce a block. 2nd law of thermodynamics as core security mechanism, as it cannot be reversed.

If you were to improve efficiency by routing excess heat for other purposes, it will gradually spread across the entire mining industry, and eventually you end up right where we started.

Re: I heat my home by mining crypto currencies

#48
post #10

I wonder if we could make it even better and make smart heaters that instead of wasting calculations actually do something useful, something like folding proteins or some other computing load that doesn't require huge network load and can be easily distributed (something like SETI@home but actually useful). In densely populated cities we could bury huge datacenters underground and use that energy for heating directly…

Produce electricity? I assume electricity was used to do the computation in the first place, turning into let's say 80% work and 20% heat. The idea was to use that 20% to heat our homes. The original electricity still needs to come from elsewhere.

No, essentially 100% of energy used for computation will turn into 'waste' heat.

If you calculate 1000 digits of pi, those digits will not embody any energy.

Re: I heat my home by mining crypto currencies

#49
I did this in an apartment I lived in years ago, and do it now in my house.

My computer room in the house is the lowest point in the house, so naturally, it tends to be a couple degrees cooler than the upstairs. This means that if I set the thermostat so that the computer room is comfortable, the bedroom is too warm. If I run the house circulation fan constantly, it's not an issue, but that consumes a decent amount of power.

If I'm going to consume that much power, I might as well mine crypto and make a few dollars. Mining for NiceHash, a service that lets people rent hashing power from miners, I'll average $100-400/month worth of Bitcoin on my RTX 3080, depending on current hashing prices, and how much of my time I spend gaming, since mining is effectively paused while gaming. The mining happens while I use my computer with no noticeable loss in performance, and it puts a few watts of energy into the room to heat it up a bit, evening it out with the rest of the house.

Re: I heat my home by mining crypto currencies

#50
post #40
post #10

I wonder if we could make it even better and make smart heaters that instead of wasting calculations actually do something useful, something like folding proteins or some other computing load that doesn't require huge network load and can be easily distributed (something like SETI@home but actually useful). In densely populated cities we could bury huge datacenters underground and use that energy for heating directly…

There are several useful BOINC-projects, for protein folding you have https://foldingathome.org/ , the projects mine computers use most time on are the projects at https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org . You can find lists of projects at https://boinc.berkeley.edu/projects.php and https://www.boincstats.com/page/projectPopularity . Interesting idea to combine it with larger heating than to heat a room or two. Many will…

> Many will probably argue that it is an ineffective way to create heat.

Electrical heating is as close to 100% efficient as you can get. Every watt your computer uses ends up as heat.

Generating those watts from non-renewable sources is much less efficient though.

I wonder if it's possible to calculate when the benefit of contributing to BOINC projects outweighs the CO2 generated.

Post reply on HN