If Materialism Is True, the United States Is Probably Conscious (2015)
71–80 of 83 posts
Re: If Materialism Is True, the United States Is Probably Conscious (2015)
#72I think groups of people are conscious in a sense. When I say conscious I'll use a definition where consciousness is the behavior of a physical system that is: * directional/goal oriented * exhibits higher order patterns / behaviors which are greater than the sum of its parts. A riot would probably be the easiest example to start with. You get a group of mildly angry people together and they can become enraged and do…
I don't think this captures most peoples' intuitive notion of consciousness at all. Most people think of it as their directly perceived experience.
For what it's worth, I actually do think that a collection of people (such as the United States) has directly perceived experiences. That's something that would be quite difficult to prove, and I believe those experiences would be very different from ours. Similarly, I think the directly perceived experiences of a housefly or an amoeba would be very different from my own as well.
Re: If Materialism Is True, the United States Is Probably Conscious (2015)
#73In other words, I don't know what materialism in any sense of the word has to do with it.
Re: If Materialism Is True, the United States Is Probably Conscious (2015)
#74Because it's always seemed to me that “if you are a materialist, you probably think conscious is an interesting fuzzy idea that would be interesting to explore if it could be adequately defined to make that possible, which it clearly hasn't and doesn't seem likely to ever be” is more accurate.
Re: If Materialism Is True, the United States Is Probably Conscious (2015)
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not at all. Hope and love don’t need to have any meaning in the wider universe in order for them to have meaning to me. Serious question—how does the notion of "hope" become any more concrete in the non-materialist view? Perhaps your immortal soul can "hope" that it hasn't been attached to a physical body with a physical brain tumour pressing upon its physical amygdala. Personally I cannot see how non-materialism use…
Either everything matters, or nothing matters. Choose one, and follow the resulting consequences.
Like I'm just trying to figure out if you're actually trying to say something meaningful or just saying something vague and abstract to try and sound "deep".
Re: If Materialism Is True, the United States Is Probably Conscious (2015)
#76As a materialist, I am not particularly taken by this particular argument (which is not to say that I would summarily reject other arguments to the same end.) It's weakness, I think, is in the claim that the United States has all the types of properties that materialists tend to regard as characteristic of conscious beings. If you favor some form of panpsychism (especially in the form that, for example, regards build…
If you’re a materialist, there is no reason to have hope, you’re just reacting to stimulus.
Re: If Materialism Is True, the United States Is Probably Conscious (2015)
#77Wait, do materialists accept both that consciousness (in the sense of sense informally and very much nonmaterially stated as “experiencing qualia”, as opposed to the medical sense which is clearly a defined material state) exists and has a single accepted coherent materialistic definition that can could be applied here? Because it's always seemed to me that “if you are a materialist, you probably think conscious is a…
Medical definition has a valid use. Does this one? I'm not sure which is whilst kind of true it falls into that class of observations and musings that are largely useless and meaningless until they can be exploited
Re: If Materialism Is True, the United States Is Probably Conscious (2015)
#78Re: If Materialism Is True, the United States Is Probably Conscious (2015)
#79https://www.amazon.com/Egregores-Occult-Entities-Watch-Desti....
Re: If Materialism Is True, the United States Is Probably Conscious (2015)
#80Can someone explain what does that mean??