141–150 of 179 posts
Sidenote: Good demonstration that even in 2021 jQuery has its place as the right tool for the job: quickly hacking together a small project.
What parts of jquery in particular?
Sidenote: Good demonstration that even in 2021 jQuery has its place as the right tool for the job: quickly hacking together a small project.
junior devs say dumb things about jQuery because they need to build experience and clout in complicated bloatware fortunately the crypto space is paying well enough these days and all you need is a wallet connect button, without a backend, so devs don't have to deal with this particular elitist bullshit to get hired by someone else anymore its actually questionable whether you need a frontend to make money right now.…
Cool. I notice that something dropped from the top accelerates downwards. But something released at the bottom doesn't seem to accelerate noticeably upwards. Even with drag, a bouyant object should accelerate towards the suface, shouldn't it?
https://iceberger.boomla.net/?id=0162f6a3c3e7e1e1bde4fade9c1...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
junior devs say dumb things about jQuery because they need to build experience and clout in complicated bloatware fortunately the crypto space is paying well enough these days and all you need is a wallet connect button, without a backend, so devs don't have to deal with this particular elitist bullshit to get hired by someone else anymore its actually questionable whether you need a frontend to make money right now.…
Was this written by GPT-3?
Cool. I notice that something dropped from the top accelerates downwards. But something released at the bottom doesn't seem to accelerate noticeably upwards. Even with drag, a bouyant object should accelerate towards the suface, shouldn't it?
Note drag increases with speed. So objects accelerate until drag negates buoyancy and then it just goes upwards at a costant speed.
So without any further knowledge about how icebergs should orient and how scientists draw them: Icebergs in 3D will generally have different mass distributions than the corresponding 2D projections that we are drawing here. For example, there will generally be higher "2D mass density" in the center. Consequently, it is possible that the scientists "drawing icebergs wrong" are actually right and it just looks/"behaves…
Hourglass shape behaves pretty cool - that is, two triangles joined at their points
And drawing them at the bottom yields very different results than partially or fully above the surface!
Here is a video at 12800x speed :P