Shadowbanning: The secret censoring by social media
1–10 of 17 posts
Re: Shadowbanning: The secret censoring by social media
#2Re: Shadowbanning: The secret censoring by social media
#3Re: Shadowbanning: The secret censoring by social media
#4Re: Shadowbanning: The secret censoring by social media
#5Shadowbanning seems a bit fraudulent as well: advertisers are led to believe there's a particular level and type of engagement on the platform, but it's at least partly false.
Re: Shadowbanning: The secret censoring by social media
#61. Sometimes it is accidental and some automated filter does this.
2. Sometimes it is done by a mod who didn't like what you posted, and shadowbans the post instead of deleting it. The hope is that you don't find out about this because otherwise you may enquire about the decision, and other mods will get involved in discussing it and over-rule the previous decision.
Re: Shadowbanning: The secret censoring by social media
#7That this technology, when available, invariably winds up being used against good-faith users seems to be the usual grubby-fingers problem where the powerful take away from the commons of social trust for a temporary advantage, akin to police using COVID contact tracing data to chase small-time drug dealers.
Re: Shadowbanning: The secret censoring by social media
#8Re: Shadowbanning: The secret censoring by social media
#9Re: Shadowbanning: The secret censoring by social media
#10I wish this site would be less heavy handed when it comes to shadow banning. It seems like a significant number of comments ends up getting shadow banned and I find it both frustrating and a bit insulting. Compared to here, Reddit is an oasis of free speech.