Live data from Hacker News

WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash

reuters.com

151–160 of 303 posts

Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash

#151
post #14

I'm so disappointed in this. Whatsapp is a functional tool. It was successful since it worked. Facebook has entirely failed to utilise it - to allow external systems to connect in so that businesses can do business on there. The voice calls are also a disaster. They've now come along to start messing with the privacy to start selling ads. It is insane that they're able to make such a mess of this. Is there a word for…

Whatsapp voice calls are pretty much the only way I can communicate with foreign family. Actually even locally, sometimes whatsapp calls are much better over wifi than cell calls over towers, it's kind of ridiculous. I don't even bother calling frequent contacts over cell any more.

Only after switching my family to Signal, I noticed how much better international voice and video call over Signal than over Whatsapp.

With Whatsapp I would often get lag, echo and generally poor voice quality, with Signal it just works perfectly, even better than regular phone calls.

Give it a try and check if it's worth it for you.

Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash

#152
post #108

It's absurd this article doesn't try to describe what the changes actually are . The privacy policy change doesn't functionally change anything about what data is collected or shared with Facebook. Metadata collection for ad targeting has been allowed by the privacy policy since 2016.

In 2016 WhatsApp let users opt-out of Facebook data sharing with third parties by just checking a box in Account Settings [1]. Most of my friends and family did opt-out. Now, as far as I understand, they are being "forced to opt-in" by accepting the new ToS and Privacy Policy or, otherwise, getting locked out. 1 - https://techcrunch.com/2016/08/25/whatsapp-to-share-user-dat...

That's not true. There is no change for users who opted out in 2016

Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash

#153
post #109
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is history delivery on first connect on Matrix whenever I set-up a new device. I don't think XMPP has any future. It's a hassle to set-up and I have yet to see a really modern looking client. Blabber does not fit that at all.

> There is history delivery on first connect on Matrix whenever I set-up a new device. Not for encrypted rooms. -- EDIT: XMPP has https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0313.html which can deliver history for the clients that support it. I just haven't set it up.

Encrypted history should appear fine on Matrix when you log in on a new device - either by gossiping from an old device, or restoring from encrypted key backup if you created one.

Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Facebook has entirely failed to utilise it - to allow external systems to connect in so that businesses can do business on there. They weren’t allowed to do that under old TOS, and the whole point of this update is to allow data sharing when contacting businesses, that will allow building business tools. https://faq.whatsapp.com/general/security-and-privacy/answer...

I understand the objective on making (more) money. Why have 1bn users and make $1 per user? Isn't it better if then have 200mn users and make $20 per user? For me this 'shedding freeloaders and privacy-oriented-users' helps them more than not. We have discussed pricing and volumes of customers before in this forum, multiple times, and for multiple products/services. Is it better to have 1000 users and make $1 from ea…

[deleted]

Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash

#155
post #108

It's absurd this article doesn't try to describe what the changes actually are . The privacy policy change doesn't functionally change anything about what data is collected or shared with Facebook. Metadata collection for ad targeting has been allowed by the privacy policy since 2016.

In 2016 WhatsApp let users opt-out of Facebook data sharing with third parties by just checking a box in Account Settings [1]. Most of my friends and family did opt-out. Now, as far as I understand, they are being "forced to opt-in" by accepting the new ToS and Privacy Policy or, otherwise, getting locked out. 1 - https://techcrunch.com/2016/08/25/whatsapp-to-share-user-dat...

No, that is entirely incorrect:

> When WhatsApp launched a major update to its privacy policy in August 2016, it started sharing user information and metadata with Facebook. At that time, the messaging service offered its billion existing users 30 days to opt out of at least some of the sharing. If you chose to opt out at the time, WhatsApp will continue to honor that choice. The feature is long gone from the app settings, but you can check whether you're opted out through the “Request account info” function in Settings.

https://www.wired.com/story/whatsapp-facebook-data-share-not...

Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash

#156
Does WhatsApp share a lot of data with Facebook? Yes.

Does this terms of service update change anything regarding that? No.

Has Facebook eroded all trust in itself such that no one really cares? Yes.

https://www.wired.com/story/whatsapp-facebook-data-share-not...

Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash

#157
post #76
post #4

Meanwhile I've switched my family and friend to Signal with great success.

Do you still have Whatsapp installed? I have seen family and friends _add_ Signal but few actually _removing_ Whatsapp from their phone. Which is not a success.

> Which is not a success.

That depends on your aims. I announced to family/friends that I was deleting WhatsApp and asked them to install Signal, and they have done, and message me via that.

My aim was to ensure that I could still converse, but not have to use a service with which I had become disenchanted. It isn't my business whether they continue to use WhatsApp or whether they delete it.

Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash

#158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Facebook has entirely failed to utilise it - to allow external systems to connect in so that businesses can do business on there. They weren’t allowed to do that under old TOS, and the whole point of this update is to allow data sharing when contacting businesses, that will allow building business tools. https://faq.whatsapp.com/general/security-and-privacy/answer...

I understand the objective on making (more) money. Why have 1bn users and make $1 per user? Isn't it better if then have 200mn users and make $20 per user? For me this 'shedding freeloaders and privacy-oriented-users' helps them more than not. We have discussed pricing and volumes of customers before in this forum, multiple times, and for multiple products/services. Is it better to have 1000 users and make $1 from ea…

> Facebook's obligation is to the shareholders.

This is the problem. Businesses must take on additional legal responsibilities and not simply say “we care about profits — at the expense of everything else”.

This will require legislation, and perhaps and end to “MBA-culture”, which seems to promote sociopaths to the highest peaks of society.

Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're not alone. I have been doing the same, but not just WhatsApp, also Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Apple.. Any company that abuses it's power to lock down, sell data from or attempt to control their users. It's often pretty lonely. Ive had friends simply stop talking with me. Ive been left out of weddings, birthdays, etc. I guess it's like trying to be a vegan at a BBQ. Worst part is that when what Id feared come…

Dont you think that maybe you are taking things a bit far if you are losing lots of friends over it? What's your threat model? You can bridge a number of these services if you want. Or use a locked down device for them. FAANG privacy crap causing you to lose friends is kinda letting them win a bit too much.

The most secure communication is the communication that doesn't happen. He can be pretty sure his communication channel will not be abused by some big advertising corp.

Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash

#160
post #14

I'm so disappointed in this. Whatsapp is a functional tool. It was successful since it worked. Facebook has entirely failed to utilise it - to allow external systems to connect in so that businesses can do business on there. The voice calls are also a disaster. They've now come along to start messing with the privacy to start selling ads. It is insane that they're able to make such a mess of this. Is there a word for…

> Is there a word for anti-innovation?

“Creative destruction” is often used to describe the phenomenon you’re describing.

It can also mean selling off critical components of a working business for more than the business is (currently) worth.

Post reply on HN