A group of my friends asked to set up a groupchat recently, our requirements varied. Among them: - needs to be simple (not all of them are techies) - need to be possible to run on desktop without any mobile need - not Facebook (my requirement) So I went and set an XMPP server up on the same machine I have my email and webserver, and wrote a quick guide on how to install blabber.im (a Conversations fork), and register…
WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash
91–100 of 303 posts
Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
How much money is it? I remember WhatsApp being £1/year, or something like that.
yes but was that enough to cover the costs even then?
Prior to Facebook acquisition, WhatsApp was a fantastic engineering effort. I don't know if it's now sunk down to normal FB standards or if they're still good.
Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash
#93The free market continues to reward Facebook, so this move must be good. I can't wait to see what the free market has in store next!
Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash
#94It's really hard for me to understand why and how something fails or succeeds to grab the public's attention. I've been complaining and refusing to use WhatsApp for years, mostly because it's centralized at the worst possible company. But a boycott of one is not a powerful move and no one cared. Now, for whatever reason, nothing has effectively changed and millions suddenly care. I mean, I'm glad they finally do, do…
It's often pretty lonely. Ive had friends simply stop talking with me. Ive been left out of weddings, birthdays, etc. I guess it's like trying to be a vegan at a BBQ.
Worst part is that when what Id feared comes true, they just move on to the next worse option and the cycle continues.
Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash
#95I'm so disappointed in this. Whatsapp is a functional tool. It was successful since it worked. Facebook has entirely failed to utilise it - to allow external systems to connect in so that businesses can do business on there. The voice calls are also a disaster. They've now come along to start messing with the privacy to start selling ads. It is insane that they're able to make such a mess of this. Is there a word for…
> Facebook has entirely failed to utilise it - to allow external systems to connect in so that businesses can do business on there. They weren’t allowed to do that under old TOS, and the whole point of this update is to allow data sharing when contacting businesses, that will allow building business tools. https://faq.whatsapp.com/general/security-and-privacy/answer...
> The messaging platform laid out fresh terms in January, aimed at increasing business transactions on the platform.
Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash
#96A group of my friends asked to set up a groupchat recently, our requirements varied. Among them: - needs to be simple (not all of them are techies) - need to be possible to run on desktop without any mobile need - not Facebook (my requirement) So I went and set an XMPP server up on the same machine I have my email and webserver, and wrote a quick guide on how to install blabber.im (a Conversations fork), and register…
Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash
#97Meanwhile I've switched my family and friend to Signal with great success.
Moxie made it stupidly hard to connect to Signal with anything that's not the official app, which is definitely a hostile act towards anyone who doesn't want to have the Signal app on their phone - the Signal desktop software needs the mobile app to work:
"To use the Signal desktop app, Signal must first be installed on your phone."
I definitely have my issues with Signal. That said, it's simple, and works reasonably well, it's just not a nice system at all from the dev/libre perspective.
Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash
#98A group of my friends asked to set up a groupchat recently, our requirements varied. Among them: - needs to be simple (not all of them are techies) - need to be possible to run on desktop without any mobile need - not Facebook (my requirement) So I went and set an XMPP server up on the same machine I have my email and webserver, and wrote a quick guide on how to install blabber.im (a Conversations fork), and register…
That doesn't feel simple. I installed Signal.
What doesn't feel simple from the user perspective?
Get https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=im.blabber.mes... , start it, follow the screen.
Or https://gajim.org/download/ for desktop, register on first run.
Or https://siskin.im/ for iOS, register on first run.
If that's not simple enough, we need to nuke the whole smartphone scene.
+ the steps above were _my_ steps, the steps of an XMPP server provider, not the steps of a user.
Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
that is the one I found easiest to move. Business is already conducted well on email, and if it needs sync chat for larger orgs then Slack steps in, and if it needs personal private sync chat then Signal steps in.
The issue a lot times is clients, for example if you work with small business.
Re: WhatsApp to move ahead with privacy update despite backlash
#100A group of my friends asked to set up a groupchat recently, our requirements varied. Among them: - needs to be simple (not all of them are techies) - need to be possible to run on desktop without any mobile need - not Facebook (my requirement) So I went and set an XMPP server up on the same machine I have my email and webserver, and wrote a quick guide on how to install blabber.im (a Conversations fork), and register…