Live data from Hacker News

Kill the Newsletter – Convert email newsletters into Atom feeds

kill-the-newsletter.com

61–70 of 127 posts

Re: Kill the Newsletter – Convert email newsletters into Atom feeds

#61
post #54

I think every email newsletter should offer an RSS feed as a matter of course. With all of ours, you just stick /rss on the end of the URL and off you go :-) e.g. https://javascriptweekly.com/rss With that said, I think there are some interesting opportunities for turning certain types of email into RSS feeds generally . I think it'd be really cool to have all of the random and very low priority emails landing at the…

Another HN today is talking about tracking pixels in newsletter mails so the sender can evaluate effectiveness. I bet a general mail-rss bridge with many subscribers would make them sad.

In case anyone's missed it, that's this thread:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26162513

- from the BBC article 'Spy pixels in emails have become endemic'

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-56071437

Re: Kill the Newsletter – Convert email newsletters into Atom feeds

#62

How about... we do both? Because it's not exactly too much effort to set up an atom and rss feed to go along with your email newsletter. Can we stop (subtly in this case, not so subtly in others) crusading against tech that we don't personally like, when thousands upon thousands rely on it because that's the format they're comfortable with and want to receive periodicals in? Set up a system that meets people where th…

I know you mean well, but this post is genuinely idiotic and the definition of a straw-man argument.

That, or you did not even bother clicking into the link and see what it is.

Re: Kill the Newsletter – Convert email newsletters into Atom feeds

#65
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ha! I had almost forgot. About a decade ago (time frame made up / guessed) I used Thunderbird as my RSS reader. Just checked and it can still do that. Since it's my primary email reader, voila! (But I use Feedly.com web site on computer and Feedly app on phone now which is easier for managing RSS than Thunderbird by a mile. Though looking below there is Export/Import of feeds, I'm not sure there's a way to just sync…

I used to use thunderbird to read RSS. The problem though is that if you don’t poll often enough (and for some feeds, that’s every few hours) you’ll miss articles and updates — and my laptop is sometimes off for a couple of days. I’ve switched to NewsBlur a few years ago. Happy paying customer. (But bot affiliated). The bonus is synchronized phone/laptop/desktop reading status.

I've been using NewsBlur since G killed Reader. Great service!

Re: Kill the Newsletter – Convert email newsletters into Atom feeds

#66

How about... we do both? Because it's not exactly too much effort to set up an atom and rss feed to go along with your email newsletter. Can we stop (subtly in this case, not so subtly in others) crusading against tech that we don't personally like, when thousands upon thousands rely on it because that's the format they're comfortable with and want to receive periodicals in? Set up a system that meets people where th…

Isn't that exactly what the submission is about? It seems to be a tool to convert any newsletter into an atom feed by creating a fake inbox. This lets everyone consume the content in their preferred format. Sure it would be nice if newsletters were available as news feeds too, but in the meantime this is a nice hack.

I’d guess that the OP is responding to the phrase “kill the newsletter” rather than the specific tool.

Re: Kill the Newsletter – Convert email newsletters into Atom feeds

#67

How about... we do both? Because it's not exactly too much effort to set up an atom and rss feed to go along with your email newsletter. Can we stop (subtly in this case, not so subtly in others) crusading against tech that we don't personally like, when thousands upon thousands rely on it because that's the format they're comfortable with and want to receive periodicals in? Set up a system that meets people where th…

I know you mean well, but this post is genuinely idiotic and the definition of a straw-man argument. That, or you did not even bother clicking into the link and see what it is.

I did, I'm taking exception with the whole "kill the newsletter" rallying cry. It's a bad call, and any "kill X!" should be questioned even if what it's used to market is a perfectly fine tool.

Re: Kill the Newsletter – Convert email newsletters into Atom feeds

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't that exactly what the submission is about? It seems to be a tool to convert any newsletter into an atom feed by creating a fake inbox. This lets everyone consume the content in their preferred format. Sure it would be nice if newsletters were available as news feeds too, but in the meantime this is a nice hack.

I’d guess that the OP is responding to the phrase “kill the newsletter” rather than the specific tool.

that.

It's a perfectly fine tool, but "kill the newsletter" is an incredibly bad rallying cry and should be questioned.

Re: Kill the Newsletter – Convert email newsletters into Atom feeds

#69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’d guess that the OP is responding to the phrase “kill the newsletter” rather than the specific tool.

that. It's a perfectly fine tool, but "kill the newsletter" is an incredibly bad rallying cry and should be questioned.

it's just a catchy name!

Re: Kill the Newsletter – Convert email newsletters into Atom feeds

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That article also has an XHTML 1.0 Transitional DOCTYPE, and wastes a request trying to load JavasScript for Google Plus.... this is not up-to-date information. The "advantages" are minor at best, and exclusively relevant to a developer, with very little impact on the end-user

Not exclusively relevant to a developer. I have one or two things in my feeds that can’t be expressed in RSS, such as HTML markup in my titles (which I use for , and I think ). I also have angle brackets in a title, which I would be afraid to do in RSS because I’m confident that some clients would butcher it, and they wouldn’t even be wrong since RSS don’t care.

This, to me, makes me ask what the purpose of a feed even is. If it's to deliver data then RSS, Atom, JSON, or YAML shouldn't make any different at all. But if it's to deliver data and markup... now we're making decisions a client could override at best or result in unreadable/a11y unfriendly content at worst. Maybe it's just me but I've never considered the feed as a place to be putting markup but even if we want to go that route then RSS's addresses this. What am I missing?
Post reply on HN