Live data from Hacker News

Spy pixels in emails 'have become endemic'

bbc.co.uk

31–40 of 341 posts

Re: Spy pixels in emails 'have become endemic'

#31
post #30
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GMail displays them. It uses a proxy for downloading, but I don't think that matters unless they're preloading all images unconditionally upon server-side receipt of the message. Apple's macOS Mail.app client displays external images by default, as does their iOS app.

Maybe the proxy removes metadata such as useragent, but often the pic urls contain uniquely identifiable information, eg a number that is unique to that email that received the email. That way you still leak that it is opened, how often, etc (unless they cache, I don't know).

Isnt the proxy downloading and caching the image before the user opens the email? If so doesnt that prevent tracking if/when the user actually opens the email?

Re: Spy pixels in emails 'have become endemic'

#32

I can't think of any email clients that automatically download external images by default. The article seems to be over-blowing the issue a bit.

Apple mail will load them if you forward an email, even if you have remote images turned off. (last I checked)

Re: Spy pixels in emails 'have become endemic'

#34
post #31
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe the proxy removes metadata such as useragent, but often the pic urls contain uniquely identifiable information, eg a number that is unique to that email that received the email. That way you still leak that it is opened, how often, etc (unless they cache, I don't know).

Isnt the proxy downloading and caching the image before the user opens the email? If so doesnt that prevent tracking if/when the user actually opens the email?

It may have changed since then, but Fillipo Valsorda wrote up some details about this, and how to validate how the proxy works - https://blog.filippo.io/how-the-new-gmail-image-proxy-works-...

Re: Spy pixels in emails 'have become endemic'

#35

I can't think of any email clients that automatically download external images by default. The article seems to be over-blowing the issue a bit.

Not only that, but the way the article came about seems to be a bit strange. Apparently the BBC asked Hey to some analysis on their emails, and have written what appears to be a publicity piece for them on the result.

Did you know that Hey allows you to block tracking pixels for the low price of $99/year? Now you do!

Not the kind of thing I'd expect to see from the publicly funded BBC.

Re: Spy pixels in emails 'have become endemic'

#37
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How? https://jioegijogeijesgioegeg.tracking.example.com/niowefioe.png?sdgsdbuegiu=rojpopwmrmwk has four places to store unique information. Does Gooogle's proxy remove all of them?

Download via a proxy and cache the image when you receive the e-mail. It's processed in the queue and opened. Was it the user? Did it hit Inbox? Where did it got opened? When it's opened? How many times it opened? All these information's reliability got out of the window with a single optimization. You can't know how this mail was processed and it's fate. So, your tracking pixel and URL returned something useless to…

Aha so it's not just a proxy. It's a pre-fetching proxy. Understood you.

Edit: oh :(

Re: Spy pixels in emails 'have become endemic'

#38

Anyone knows if pihole blocks those addresses?

Potentially, depending on your Pi-hole’s blocklists. For reference you could check against these popular spy pixel lists:

https://github.com/apparition47/MailTrackerBlocker/blob/main...

https://gist.github.com/dhh/360f4dc7ddbce786f8e82b97cdad9d20

https://gist.github.com/leggett/8c2ab9735037cb66c218fdbe898d...

Re: Spy pixels in emails 'have become endemic'

#40
For legitimate email marketers these pixels are important to have because:

1. Helps to prune users who never open emails thus giving you a smaller more engaged list.

2. Helps to see if the content they are sending to users is leading to engagement so they can send better emails next time.

Yes, yes I know. Why even send emails in the first place.

All email marketing is not evil.

But legitimate marketers have businesses to run in the real world and without these little pixels they would be sending un-targeted and mostly useless marketing messages to legitimate subscribers.

Post reply on HN