Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0?
oxinabox.net
Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0?
1–10 of 212 posts
Re: Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0?
#2Re: Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0?
#3This amuses me. I hadn't really considered the author's perspective, and now I think it aligns with my take on it pretty well.
Re: Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0?
#4Re: Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0?
#5Really nice to see so many little useability improvements -- like easy temporary envs, syntax highlighting in dependency conflict errors, and more partially-applied functions -- as well as more significant language development on threading, stack allocations, and reducing latency.
Re: Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0?
#6Some questions still in mind since I reviewed previously
(1) How is its database connectivity?
(2) Is there something like python's `requests` lib?
(3) Are the features mature enough that I don't anticipate major rewrites for code each year?
Re: Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0?
#7I come back every so often to check out Julia again. I have hopes for it. Some questions still in mind since I reviewed previously (1) How is its database connectivity? (2) Is there something like python's `requests` lib? (3) Are the features mature enough that I don't anticipate major rewrites for code each year?
EDIT after actually looking at the article: the “no breaking changes” commitment is right at the top.
Re: Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0?
#8I come back every so often to check out Julia again. I have hopes for it. Some questions still in mind since I reviewed previously (1) How is its database connectivity? (2) Is there something like python's `requests` lib? (3) Are the features mature enough that I don't anticipate major rewrites for code each year?
Databases are not really my thing but: From what I hear: It is ok. Not amazing. But decent.
LibPQ.jl is very mature (we run it in production). MySQL.jl exists, I hear about SQLite.jl being used pretty often.
I know people use ODBC.jl, and JDBC.jl, though only because they complaint about things. I suspect there are a fair few people using them without complain that i never hear from. Though I haven't heard any mention really of JDBC in a while.
While there is nothing like SQLAlchemy, a nice thing about DataBases in julia is they all conform to Tables.jl tables. So very easy to take your DataFrame library of choice (or CSV reader, or Arrow.jl or a dozen other formats), and use that is the input or output from a database query.
Re: Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0?
#9I come back every so often to check out Julia again. I have hopes for it. Some questions still in mind since I reviewed previously (1) How is its database connectivity? (2) Is there something like python's `requests` lib? (3) Are the features mature enough that I don't anticipate major rewrites for code each year?
Re: Julia 1.6: what has changed since Julia 1.0?
#10I come back every so often to check out Julia again. I have hopes for it. Some questions still in mind since I reviewed previously (1) How is its database connectivity? (2) Is there something like python's `requests` lib? (3) Are the features mature enough that I don't anticipate major rewrites for code each year?
https://genieframework.github.io/Genie.jl/dev/guides/Working...