Don't do this.
Don’t do what...?
The GPL-Violations.org Project (2016)
31–36 of 36 posts
Re: The GPL-Violations.org Project (2016)
#32[deleted]
Re: The GPL-Violations.org Project (2016)
#33If you manage a website like this, I implore you to spend an hour and think about someones first-time experience when they land on your site. - The logo goes to the homepage - the "gpl-violations.org" link goes to the homepage - the page title goes to the homepage - About describes the goal of the project and who's behind it, but not how to access the project... or if that's even a thing. - The GPL page lists the GPL…
One more minor point: http should redirect to https.
Re: The GPL-Violations.org Project (2016)
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
Last entry in the news section is from 2016. Looks dead in the water to me.
I guess laforge is doing other things atm, but i guess he at least hasn't called it dead: http://gnumonks.org/~laforge/projects/license-compliance/
His current focus is open source mobile communications networks:
Re: The GPL-Violations.org Project (2016)
#35Reminds me: Bradley and Karen from the Software Freedom Conservancy have a podcast largely about foss legal topics [1] [1] https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/free-as-in-freedom/id4...
Drop the "the", just "Software Freedom Conservancy", it's cleaner. :) I'd been a fan of them for years before I realized there was no "the".
In spoken language, the people at Conservancy generally call the organization "Conservancy" (no "the") but I believe prefer "the Software Freedom Conservancy" as the full name. It's true that "the" is not in the official name of the organization. In written language they also say "Conservancy" (no "the") for short, but (judging from sfconservancy.org) seem to prefer "Software Freedom Conservancy" (no "the") for the full name.
Re: The GPL-Violations.org Project (2016)
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
Drop the "the", just "Software Freedom Conservancy", it's cleaner. :) I'd been a fan of them for years before I realized there was no "the".
In spoken language, the people at Conservancy generally call the organization "Conservancy" (no "the") but I believe prefer "the Software Freedom Conservancy" as the full name. It's true that "the" is not in the official name of the organization. In written language they also say "Conservancy" (no "the") for short, but (judging from sfconservancy.org) seem to prefer "Software Freedom Conservancy" (no "the") for the f…
Is anyone else picturing Jack Black in a record store right now?