Live data from Hacker News

EU privacy agency urges more safeguards to curb U.S. tech giants

reuters.com

91–100 of 171 posts

Re: EU privacy agency urges more safeguards to curb U.S. tech giants

#91
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For me (EU) the consent popup has "reject all" at the very bottom (though I only see it with blocking disabled). Pretty lame, but still better than most.

"For me (EU) [..]" You are probably not the right person to ask then, but I always wondered: How prevalent are these consent popups outside of the EU?

In the US, I see them fairly often. Doubly annoying because I know they don't even have to obey my answers in the US.

Re: EU privacy agency urges more safeguards to curb U.S. tech giants

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How about they find alternate revenue channels? Like every other business in the world?

Sounds like a great opportunity for you to enter the market and capture one of these alternative revenue channels with your ad-free search engine.

Yep. People don’t pay for search anymore. They haven’t since Google took over the world a decade and a half ago. That’s not to say free is the best option, but people don’t want to pay when there’s a free solution that works just as well.

Re: EU privacy agency urges more safeguards to curb U.S. tech giants

#95
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Disqus loads a million external resources That’s so stupid, why not just take your OWN cookie and use it in the backend to send to all these resources, proxying through your own server or having a CNAME for theirs under your domain?

I guess it's often much simpler and cheaper to not try to hide it. The CNAME practice is becoming more and more common. See https://blog.apnic.net/2020/08/04/characterizing-cname-cloak... or https://medium.com/nextdns/cname-cloaking-the-dangerous-disg... or https://www.laquadrature.net/2020/10/05/le-deguisement-des-t... I think proxying or doing it server side only will be implemented later when these people will be…

I think the move will be for ANAME records. ANAME is not a real record (yet), but some providers are supporting them.

It is similar to a CNAME record but instead of storing the domain name you want to map to it pulls the A record and puts that IP as your A record.

Re: EU privacy agency urges more safeguards to curb U.S. tech giants

#96
post #84

really excited for more popup policies to approve

It’s so irritating that this can’t be an HTTP header. Then again, we probably have the failure of DNT to thank for that.

The problem was the DNT was optional, so there was no legal method to force a website to obey it.

Re: EU privacy agency urges more safeguards to curb U.S. tech giants

#97

What the EU should really do is fine / tax monopolists like Google and Facebook into submission then invest that money into the EU-based startup ecosystem.

The EU would need to rewrite it's tax code.

Right now, everything is going through Luxembourg and Ireland... perfectly legally!

> then invest that money into the EU-based startup ecosystem.

So bureaucrats deciding where money is going... How did that work out for the EU again?

Re: EU privacy agency urges more safeguards to curb U.S. tech giants

#98
post #7
post #5

At this point honestly I just wish for a general ban on tracking ads of any kind. Just give me good old contextual ads and remove some MBs of js, with the only purpose of tracking me, from most websites of the internet.

How would the EU enforce such a ban? They actually need to prove company X was tracking its users if it goes to court.

How about we make them prove they are not tracking users instead?

Re: EU privacy agency urges more safeguards to curb U.S. tech giants

#99
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How would the EU enforce such a ban? They actually need to prove company X was tracking its users if it goes to court.

How about we make them prove they are not tracking users instead?

How could I prove my blog doesn't track you?

Re: EU privacy agency urges more safeguards to curb U.S. tech giants

#100
post #49
post #5

At this point honestly I just wish for a general ban on tracking ads of any kind. Just give me good old contextual ads and remove some MBs of js, with the only purpose of tracking me, from most websites of the internet.

The thing is these ads are not exactly effective either. I mean you'll read about the guru's with 90% conversion rate at 0.50c per click or some garbage like that but when you run them yourself, with what is considered a normal company (not a unicorn) you somehow find yourself with a They are crazy cheap though and essentially act like a TV/Radio ad. It's about getting repeated exposure, even if it's not a direct con…

Anecdotally they're effective on me. I've bought lots of things through fb/instagram ads.
Post reply on HN