Some of the primary arguments he uses against Bitcoin are actually its strengths. Fundamentally, Bitcoins will be in higher demand than dollars because their value will continue to rise instead of fall. This means that goods and services as priced in bitcoins will be discounted compared to dollars, driving their adoption. You can see this same dynamic at work in black markets around the world where the USD is the de…
The Quora post that killed Bitcoins. Please discuss if his arguments are valid.
11–20 of 324 posts
Re: The Quora post that killed Bitcoins. Please discuss if his arguments are valid.
#12Re: The Quora post that killed Bitcoins. Please discuss if his arguments are valid.
#13Given the rewards that have already accrued to Bitcoin early adopters, I am surprised other competing cryptocurrency networks have not yet already been created. Lots of people who wish they had started mining coins back in the days before GPU mining would be eager to get in on the ground floor of an alternative.
Most problems with the critiques of Bitcoin like those in the linked Quora post is that they are debunking a straw man - the idea that Bitcoin is intended as a universal replacement for all other currency systems. By those standards of course it will fail. Looked at in another way, think of Bitcoin as something more like MMORPG loot. If people are willing to spend vast amounts of "real money" on items for their WoW character, spending that money on Bitcoins instead makes it seem like a sane investment rather than just flushing it away.
I've mentioned before that I think governmental action to criminalize Bitcoin and analogous technology is an even more serious threat to long-term value. If there is one thing that really might make the world's governments team up to completely ban strong encryption, it is a potential threat to governmental control over taxation and currencies.
Re: The Quora post that killed Bitcoins. Please discuss if his arguments are valid.
#14Inflation encourages holders of capital to use it to invest in other things. That is, inflation encourages productivity. The inflation has to be relatively low, of course. Probably low enough to allow someone to retire without worry.
Re: The Quora post that killed Bitcoins. Please discuss if his arguments are valid.
#15As an zeroHedge reading, armchair economist i think there are a lot of flaws in that guys argument "Bitcoin does not have a central bank capable of printing and lending bitcoins" >>I rather think thats the point. Lending is inflationary. "Built in Deflation" >> God knows how the computer industry makes money when if i hold my $$$ just a little longer, i can buy an even better machine. "For Bitcoin to work as a curren…
Not really. Because if you expect the value of your cash to rise, you would probably hold onto your cash. The liquidity of the system would drop as people hoard their cash (what happened during the Great Depression), depressing an economy.
"bank run"
He's talking about the need to inject cash into the system during economic shocks (the reason for the Fed injecting money into the system). This, again, happened during the Great Depression, as perfectly sound and profitable banks toppled left and right because of the bank runs, taking down the rest of the economy.
Re: The Quora post that killed Bitcoins. Please discuss if his arguments are valid.
#16Re: The Quora post that killed Bitcoins. Please discuss if his arguments are valid.
#17Re: The Quora post that killed Bitcoins. Please discuss if his arguments are valid.
#18It's just FUD.