Live data from Hacker News

Wikimedia narrows down the app sendin 90M requests to a pic of flower

phabricator.wikimedia.org

1–10 of 105 posts

Re: Wikimedia narrows down the app sendin 90M requests to a pic of flower

#2
> To recap, we were aware of the following at this stage:

> it is a popular chat/social media mobile app used in India

> it sets the User-Agent and Referer to '-'

> it fetches the image from Wikimedia Commons but does not display it

And then they identified which app it was, but it is not revealed

Re: Wikimedia narrows down the app sendin 90M requests to a pic of flower

#5
This seems interesting from a legal point of view as well:

Is an app downloading, but never displaying, creative commons content infringing on copyright (by not showing correct attribution and violating the CC terms)?

Besides copyright, could this be considered theft of service?

Re: Wikimedia narrows down the app sendin 90M requests to a pic of flower

#7
post #2

> To recap, we were aware of the following at this stage: > it is a popular chat/social media mobile app used in India > it sets the User-Agent and Referer to '-' > it fetches the image from Wikimedia Commons but does not display it And then they identified which app it was, but it is not revealed

Any idea why they don't name the app?

Re: Wikimedia narrows down the app sendin 90M requests to a pic of flower

#8
post #7
post #2

> To recap, we were aware of the following at this stage: > it is a popular chat/social media mobile app used in India > it sets the User-Agent and Referer to '-' > it fetches the image from Wikimedia Commons but does not display it And then they identified which app it was, but it is not revealed

Any idea why they don't name the app?

Wikimedia is simply trying to be polite and not to publicly shame the company.

Re: Wikimedia narrows down the app sendin 90M requests to a pic of flower

#10
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Any idea why they don't name the app?

Wikimedia is simply trying to be polite and not to publicly shame the company.

It could provoke an angry mob, which doesn't help anybody.
Post reply on HN