Earlier quoted context omitted.
The greed is the chairs of central banks and the policymakers who are debasing other monies (some people benefit more than others from this). If they weren't debasing other people's hard earned value, there would be no need for bitcoin. But since they are, and are doing it at an increasing pace, the demand for bitcoin is inevitable.
You'll have to explain to me how replacing inflationary currencies with a deflationary one makes any sense in that context. Inflationary currencies punish those hoarding money, deflationary currencies reward them. The idea that bitcoin is good for the less fortunate and bad for rich people is pure propaganda and not based on reality. It's going to make a bunch of early adopters very rich, and that's about it.
Not all rich people have low time preferences. Particularly those who are involved in the fiat system and who benefit from the expansion of debt. They think in quarters.
And not all poor people have high time preferences, but under fiat, saving money is highly discouraged because it loses purchasing power. People are encouraged to spend or invest in stonks - where the markets are rigged to benefit the big players.
Everyone benefits in a society where capital is accumulated, rather than debt.
As for "rich versus poor," this is a distraction because their is nothing you can do about it besides resorting to theft, which makes the problem worse.
The problem has always been "thieves versus hard workers." The current system is one where central banks and those close to them are stealing the time that other people have put into labour by deliberately devaluing their money.