Earlier quoted context omitted.
Again, you don't have to use this book. There are hundreds of books on algorithms, many of which have solutions for people who need them. Getting all pissy with the author because he doesn't provide them is sad and not neccessary.
I don't know, I think he made a very fair critique. Sure, there are hundreds of algorithms textbooks. But there are hundreds of anything. Anyone can make anything they want to, and they are subject to criticism for that.
Algorithms by Jeff Erickson
61–70 of 162 posts
Re: Algorithms by Jeff Erickson
#62I think there are more than enough books to learn algorithms now. But there are a very little amount of resources that teach how to use them to solve problems.
Re: Algorithms by Jeff Erickson
#63Not proving solutions to textbooks seems to be a common theme in mathematics and theoretical computer science. It makes it difficult for those outside of the traditional classroom to learn the material. Instead textbook writers seem to have this adversarial approach against readers, thinking they’ll “cheat themselves” if they look up solutions or attempt to verify their work. Experts make mistakes, beginners would pr…
Re: Algorithms by Jeff Erickson
#64Algorithms definitely helped me prove code without explicitly writing it
Re: Algorithms by Jeff Erickson
#65From https://jeffe.cs.illinois.edu/teaching/algorithms/hwex.html#... > Please do not ask me for solutions. With very rare exceptions, I will say no, even if you are an instructor. I recognize that my stance limits the utility of these materials, especially for self-learners, but I'm trying to optimize the learning experience of my own students at Illinois. The point of homework is not to solve that particular homewor…
Re: Algorithms by Jeff Erickson
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
They weren’t attacking the author. It’s a valid argument regardless of the cost of the book. Free doesn’t mean you can’t criticize anything.
There was an accusatory, hostile tone that I personally found off-putting and not worthy of an HN discussion. asicsp’s comment[1] was much more useful and neutral. 1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26074429
Re: Algorithms by Jeff Erickson
#67Good ‘ole CS 373, had Erickson back in 2002 and it’s def. a defining course in CS at UIUC. The answers to a lot of these are now google-able; you’ll learn more by researching than being spoon fed the solution! Imagine those of us students back then when google wasn’t a verb yet trying to solve these problems!
All of the X73 classes were defining for me. Probably my favorite classes and ones that changed the way my brain works.
I am looking to self-study for core CS content that I missed out on in school after being largely self-taught, and courses that change the way one’s brain works sound like the right ones to take.
Re: Algorithms by Jeff Erickson
#68I think there are more than enough books to learn algorithms now. But there are a very little amount of resources that teach how to use them to solve problems.
Re: Algorithms by Jeff Erickson
#69I'm a developer, but don't have the foggiest idea of how to prove something by induction. Is this the kind of book I should look at? Or is there something that should be taken as a prerequisite?