Tesla spent $1.5B in clean car credits on Bitcoin
amycastor.com
Tesla spent $1.5B in clean car credits on Bitcoin
1–10 of 162 posts
Re: Tesla spent $1.5B in clean car credits on Bitcoin
#2Re: Tesla spent $1.5B in clean car credits on Bitcoin
#3I always wondered what will happen when the environmentalists find out about the energy consumption requirements of Bitcoin.
Re: Tesla spent $1.5B in clean car credits on Bitcoin
#4I always wondered what will happen when the environmentalists find out about the energy consumption requirements of Bitcoin.
Re: Tesla spent $1.5B in clean car credits on Bitcoin
#5I always wondered what will happen when the environmentalists find out about the energy consumption requirements of Bitcoin.
The counterargument is always that at some point in future the energy consumption problem will be solved, but isn't the rate of computation a or the main factor against 50%+ attacks? Else the solutions proposed seemed to relay on centralized services that don't actually play on the blockchain to reduce the actual amount of transactions and load, also then avoiding the delays - but then re-adding the supposed main iss…
Re: Tesla spent $1.5B in clean car credits on Bitcoin
#6Re: Tesla spent $1.5B in clean car credits on Bitcoin
#7Claim: Bitcoin wastes too much energy.
Counter-Claim: Bitcoin’s energy consumption is more efficient than that of gold and traditional banks.
Re: Tesla spent $1.5B in clean car credits on Bitcoin
#8I always wondered what will happen when the environmentalists find out about the energy consumption requirements of Bitcoin.
Re: Tesla spent $1.5B in clean car credits on Bitcoin
#9Bitcoin is already the greenest form of finance and will get much cleaner in the future.
Re: Tesla spent $1.5B in clean car credits on Bitcoin
#10I always wondered what will happen when the environmentalists find out about the energy consumption requirements of Bitcoin.
It seems like 100% of people should want air which is non-toxic, water which is non-toxic and food which is non-toxic.
But of course, being an "abolitionist" was a political group in the 1800s but now it's just assumed that 100% of people are anti-slavery, so maybe the optimistic take is that "environmentalist" will undergo the same transformation as "abolitionist".