Live data from Hacker News

My Opinion on Blockchain

vladcalin.ro

11–20 of 107 posts

Re: My Opinion on Blockchain

#11
I feel like the author here really misses what makes this movement in technology interesting, and that is evident in the title. Blockchain is not the innovation, distributed ledgers are. Blockchain is just one component in one formula that made it work. When you take DLT as the focus, you can examine how disruptive the technology CAN be on traditional ledger systems that require enormous amounts of human energy to maintain. And those who maintain these systems tend to take advantage of those systems. There's so much to be gained by automating away many of the traditional roles banks play.

One handy thing about Bitcoin and systems like it is that, by creating digital money systems, the industry is funding itself which will hopefully lead to the rapid evolution of technologies within the space. There are hard problems to solve, but enormous incentives to solve those problems.

Re: My Opinion on Blockchain

#12
I agree that blockchain isn't great for currencies (as we understand them). It seems potentially great for tracking rights in situations where there are multiple parties and those parties may be adversarial.

Imagine a blockchain system for tracking who has the rights to stream a movie. Copyright holders can issue 'coins' with the streaming rights to users' accounts, everyone signs a contract saying the blockchain is authoritative - now you have an open market on streaming. Any streaming media company can stream you a movie assuming you have the token. Users can run their own blockchain network to maintain the system if the companies move on.

Re: My Opinion on Blockchain

#13

Blockchain makes possible to validate ownership. This may allow, in the future, to create negotiable virtual objects. Think about furniture, clothes or items in games or virtual environments where you can buy, sell, prove ownership and even have controlled scarcity. No DRM needed!

It also permits you to permanently lose that ownership, irrevocably, if you lose your keys.

Re: My Opinion on Blockchain

#15

> they say that the fact that it is deflationary and can not see inflation is a good thing, when it is actually a bad thing. There is a reason the target inflation is at ~2% almost everywhere. We need inflation to keep the economy going. And what is the magical reason why we need to keep the economy going? We're burning through this planet's resources much faster than they are being replenished. The economy needs to…

Then why waste electricity in the equivalent of Denmark on math puzzles just to write 1MB of data every 10 minutes?

Re: My Opinion on Blockchain

#16
post #4

> they say that the fact that it is deflationary and can not see inflation is a good thing, when it is actually a bad thing. There is a reason the target inflation is at ~2% almost everywhere. We need inflation to keep the economy going. I don't doubt that at some point we'll see crypto getting a self-deleting coin. Balance today is $1. Tomorrow it's $.9995.

Issued by FED ECB etc (thats what they already do with their non blockchain “tokens” ;) )

Re: My Opinion on Blockchain

#17
> while day-dreaming about selling it for a huge profit (in FIAT currency)

This isn't really true. The dream is that crypto becomes the reserve currency itself, and spendable after hard work on scaling solutions. There is no hypocrisy.

The Morpheus meme is one of the oldest and strongest that Bitcoin has. [0]

> Every advocate promotes holding, which is not what a currency is for

Holding is just a new meme for an old concept: Save your money. Saving your money is something your parents teach you when you're a kid. It doesn't mean dollars aren't a currency.

[0] https://i.redd.it/3525lt9kvir01.jpg

Re: My Opinion on Blockchain

#18
post #14

> if you lose your key, you lose the access to your wallet for good and nobody can help you. Which is why Vitalik advocates social recovery wallets: https://vitalik.ca/general/2021/01/11/recovery.html

Is this something that's already implemented, or is this a "sure would be nice" proposal?

Re: My Opinion on Blockchain

#19
post #8

For the financial arguments: Treat BTC as if it was in the "precious metal" asset class, but digital. Volatility is still an issue, but it's still a pretty new technology. As a technology, I agree that it's not that impressive. Stop making so many dang vaporware altcoins.

The problem with the argument is it always ends up circular to some extent. I always see something like the below - where crypto enthusiasts always try to argue bitcoin is something different than the current argument being levied against it...

Crypto Enthusiast: "Bitcoin is a currency"

Crypto Sceptic: "Well it's not a very good currency because of X, Y & Z reasons, and nobody is spending it"

Crypto Enthusiast: "Well it's not really a currency, you need to treat it as a precious metal"

Crypto Sceptic: "But precious metals have intrinsic value - ultimately you can make something from them"

Crypto Enthusiast: "Well it's more like you can make sure your money grows rather than being shrunk through inflation - look how it's always growing!"

Crypto Sceptic: "But isn't the growth just driven by pure speculation? As in price increases just come from new people entering crypto at the bottom, and pushing it up to people who bought it earlier, who have an incentive to promote it? A bit like a ponzi scheme? I mean nobody is spending it so if it's not growing what's the point?"

Crypto Enthusiast: "Well if it stops growing that's fine because it's really a currency"

Re: My Opinion on Blockchain

#20
The author is using first-principles economic reasoning to argue against "blockchain" (but actually bitcoin/bitcoin-like cryptocurrencies). The author also seems to dislike crypto-investors because of their intent/reasoning which is counter to popular economic theory.

The author should be more specific in their claims, and do more research on the space. Blockchain is a technology, not a cryptocurrency. Cryptocurrencies each have methods for resolving micro-transactions (e.g. side chains) and wallet storage (centralized solutions like banks, or UIs like MetaMask).

I agree that many crypto-investors are looking to make a quick buck. That alone does not make something a bad idea, this isn't a centrally managed scam that dumb investors get tricked into. Blockhain's influence on fiat currencies is something that plenty of smart people aren't sure about.

FWIW I am not that invested in the space. But the author is missing technical details to make a compelling argument.

Post reply on HN