Live data from Hacker News

Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future

techcrunch.com

31–40 of 1001 posts

Re: Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future

#32
post #3

Legitimizing Bitcoin more than offsets the environmental benefits of electric vehicles.

What percent of the electricity used by Bitcoin miners is generated by fossil fuels? My impression is that most miners are located to take advantage of locales with very cheap hydroelectric/geothermal or take advantage of subsidized/overbuilt renewables. But I could be wrong. Any data on this?

whatever has the lowest costs

Re: Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future

#36

Soon, a nation might realistically buy $100 B + of bitcoin and declare it a national currency.

80% of transactions are settled in USD so they'll either become an economic island cut off from the world, or just buy back USD later, possibly at a loss

Re: Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future

#37
post #3

Legitimizing Bitcoin more than offsets the environmental benefits of electric vehicles.

The energy cost of running the bitcoin network is ~constant in relation to the number of transactions processed.

Cost of running the network also goes down with time as fewer bitcoins are issued as block rewards.

It goes up with the price of bitcoin, as more miners spend electricity on mining.

Those things have historically led to increased energy costs for the network, but in the future they could well lead to decreased energy use too.

Re: Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in the future

#38
post #3

Legitimizing Bitcoin more than offsets the environmental benefits of electric vehicles.

What percent of the electricity used by Bitcoin miners is generated by fossil fuels? My impression is that most miners are located to take advantage of locales with very cheap hydroelectric/geothermal or take advantage of subsidized/overbuilt renewables. But I could be wrong. Any data on this?

If they're on an electric grid that also has fossil fuels, then it doesn't really matter. More clean energy to them is less to other customers, who have to make up for it with more fossil.
Post reply on HN