Are there any decent search engines that do what you actually say left instead of extremely poorly trying to guess what you mean?
Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?
1–10 of 15 posts
Re: Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?
#2Re: Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?
#3appears to work for me
Re: Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?
#4Re: Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?
#5They'll do what's profitable over what's accurate.
Re: Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?
#6Re: Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?
#7Re: Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?
#8Make sure you aren't putting the minus symbol in quotes. The quotes are what I see people get wrong. Many people still try to use the + symbol to indicate required but Google disabled that when working on Google+ and switched to quotes to indicate required words or phrases.
Re: Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?
#9The cynical take: They'll do what's profitable over what's accurate.
It's like replying "it's more profitable this way" to "why are chopsticks popular in asian culture".
Re: Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?
#10I use this feature all the time. Maybe you're getting A/B tested?
The worst thing is when I'm trying to remove garbage results so things like "free account" or "need to signup" for a bunch of spam sites. Those things are always ignored.
It's stupid that I need to essentially groom my results with my own code.