Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 15 posts

Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?

#1
Google, Bing, Duckduckgo, Yahoo, it seems like all of them have decided to stop honoring the "-". Surround things by quotes, add them multiple times, it doesn't seem to matter.

Are there any decent search engines that do what you actually say left instead of extremely poorly trying to guess what you mean?

Re: Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?

#8
Google still has it documented on https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/2466433 and there is a none of these words option on https://www.google.com/advanced_search

Make sure you aren't putting the minus symbol in quotes. The quotes are what I see people get wrong. Many people still try to use the + symbol to indicate required but Google disabled that when working on Google+ and switched to quotes to indicate required words or phrases.

Re: Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?

#9

The cynical take: They'll do what's profitable over what's accurate.

This isn't a cynical comment, it's just nonsensical in this context.

It's like replying "it's more profitable this way" to "why are chopsticks popular in asian culture".

Re: Ask HN: Why do search engines ignore the exclusion operator now “-”?

#10
post #7

I use this feature all the time. Maybe you're getting A/B tested?

I try to use it all the time. I've done crude things like written browser plugins to sift through results and remove things because the search engines just ignore it.

The worst thing is when I'm trying to remove garbage results so things like "free account" or "need to signup" for a bunch of spam sites. Those things are always ignored.

It's stupid that I need to essentially groom my results with my own code.

Post reply on HN