Live data from Hacker News

Our experience with the Fediverse, and why we left

infosec-handbook.eu

221–224 of 224 posts

Re: Our experience with the Fediverse, and why we left

#221

I've hosted a mastodon instance since 2017 and I see one general misunderstanding over and over, on mastodon or on fediverse related subreddits. People think it's a completely new concept. People seem to have forgotten, or not been part of, all the message boards we used to have during the late 90s and all throughout the 2000s. The ONLY thing Mastodon brings to this is federation. You used to have accounts on over a…

Can I browse another server from mastodon? it seems I can only choose from my feed (people i follow), the local feed (my server), or the global feed. This is a really rough experience because my server is one of the big generic servers so there is no specific discussion and indeed it’s mostly people and bots screaming into the void, and of course the global feed is the same except the volume of posts is much larger a…

You don't need an account on an instance to view the instance.

Mastodon, for example, can be configured to display popular users of that instance.

https://mastodon.social/explore/popular

Re: Our experience with the Fediverse, and why we left

#222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not quite: Twitter and Facebook have _armies_ of community moderation employees at their disposal; the fediverse has volunteers.

No, the fediverse has at least one per instance, often more. I would even go as far saying the fedi has more mods per users. They're still only mods, for the instance they're on, though.

I have never seen pornography on Facebook.

I saw pornography of very dubious legality within seconds of opening a public Mastodon server during my first time checking out the fediverse. It was enough to convince me never to use Mastodon again.

Re: Our experience with the Fediverse, and why we left

#223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, the fediverse has at least one per instance, often more. I would even go as far saying the fedi has more mods per users. They're still only mods, for the instance they're on, though.

I have never seen pornography on Facebook. I saw pornography of very dubious legality within seconds of opening a public Mastodon server during my first time checking out the fediverse. It was enough to convince me never to use Mastodon again.

And I saw pornography on Twitter, which obviously IS THE ting Mastodon copies, too. It totally depends on the instance's mods what they allow and yes, mastodon.social allows porn. Mastodon is not a social platform for catholics. If you see porn without NSFW Content Warning, you can report it.

Re: Our experience with the Fediverse, and why we left

#224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're interested in hosting a discussion based community similar to HN or reddit, I'm working on a project that might interest you. Link in my bio.

What would be involved in hosting something like this? I'm always looking for stuff to host (and have been sick of reddit for a few years now), but anything I host would just be a server in my room on a residential IP, which may not have the reliability you want

Sorry for the late-late reply, I am not very active on HN. Hosting this requires a go compiler mostly and patience to fiddle with the sources, or to pester me on the mailing list to write proper instructions for deployment. The little documentation that there is is hosted here[1].

[1] https://github.com/mariusor/go-littr/blob/master/doc/INSTALL...

Post reply on HN